From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add ghmm. Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 08:38:19 +0200 Message-ID: <87fut8hsf8.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> References: <1464000720-4054-1-git-send-email-ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de> <20160523170102.GC23553@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48163) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b55z5-0000jl-Vr for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 02:38:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b55z1-00058Q-QP for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 02:38:30 -0400 Received: from sinope02.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de ([141.80.25.24]:55485) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b55z1-00058L-J4 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 24 May 2016 02:38:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160523170102.GC23553@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari writes: > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 12:52:00PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> * gnu/packages/machine-learning.scm (ghmm): New variable. > >> +(define-public ghmm >> + ;; The latest release candidate is several years and a couple of fixes have >> + ;; been published since. This is why we download the sources from the SVN >> + ;; repository. > > Wow, seems there are quite a few more things fixed in this package > definition! > > I think if the software works for you, then it's okay. The added phases > look good to me and it builds on my x86_64 hardware. Thanks for checking! >> + (home-page "http://ghmm.org") > > Does this render in your browser? For Firefox, it serves some HTML sans > which includes a note about my browser not supporting frames. > Chromium and Epiphany work. Not a blocker, just a curiosity... Yes, it renders fine. Looks good in Icecat on my personal machine and in Firefox on my Fedora workstation in the office. ~~ Ricardo