From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Pytest update Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 10:29:48 +0200 Message-ID: <87furgo9vn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160703055839.GB4135@debian-netbook> <20160703201517.GA26140@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40558) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMWbE-0000Jj-EV for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 04:29:57 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bMWbB-00041f-A7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Jul 2016 04:29:56 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160703201517.GA26140@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Sun, 3 Jul 2016 16:15:17 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari skribis: > On Sun, Jul 03, 2016 at 08:58:39AM +0300, Efraim Flashner wrote: >> The patch-set looks good to me. For the curious, I checked python-pytest >> and python2-pytest and ended up with 81 packages and 235 dependants, but >> some of those are from my WIP tree in GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH > > What branch should it go on? > > Also, it would be good to push this series and the Sphinx series > together. > > $ guix refresh -l python-sphinx python2-sphinx python-pytest python2-pyte= st > Building the following 84 packages would ensure 229 dependent packages ar= e rebuilt: > [...] > > So, it's basically the same set of packages that would need to be > re-built. The =E2=80=98python-updates=E2=80=99 branch would seem right to me. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.