From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Kost Subject: Re: Should guix-emacs-autoload-packages use GUIX_ENVIRONMENT? Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 23:06:08 +0300 Message-ID: <87fudjgdzj.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87zibwlymy.fsf@kyleam.com> <87eft6j1s3.fsf@gmail.com> <87379mpz1a.fsf@kyleam.com> <87379l1qip.fsf@gmail.com> <87h8y1jwv8.fsf@kyleam.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52947) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1daSZT-0004Pz-Kj for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 16:06:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1daSZQ-0000QU-4H for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 16:06:15 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-x22f.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c07::22f]:36632) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1daSZP-0000Pr-R9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 16:06:12 -0400 Received: by mail-lf0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id o85so13102173lff.3 for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2017 13:06:11 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Kyle Meyer Cc: guix-devel Kyle Meyer (2017-07-24 18:25 -0400) wrote: > Alex Kost writes: > > [...] > >>>> However, I agree that GUIX_ENVIRONMENT should be honored, but as I wrote >>>> *not instead* but *along with* the default profiles. So if you start >>>> emacs like this: >>>> >>>> guix environment --ad-hoc emacs emacs-wget -- emacs >>>> >>>> it should contain emacs-wget in its load-path. WDYT? >>> >>> I certainly agree with that load-path should include emacs-wget. I'm >>> just not sure I agree with the "along with". >> >> Now I'm also not sure if "along with" or "instead" is better. I don't >> have a preference, so I agree with any choice :-) > > ... I'd say "along with" is better. > > As I said in my previous post, it's quite easy for me to get the > behavior I want, so I'd prefer to go with your gut feeling about the > expected behavior. OK, so if the others agree with "along with" policy, would you like to update your patch for it? -- Alex