From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kei Kebreau Subject: Re: 02/02: gnu: python-pillow: Update to 4.3.0. Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2017 12:09:23 -0500 Message-ID: <87fu7ywx8c.fsf@posteo.net> References: <20171222165126.23934.71746@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20171222165127.9F00B2044A@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <87tvwgknwv.fsf@netris.org> <87tvwgvt8c.fsf@posteo.net> <87incvlrgi.fsf@netris.org> <87o9mnwwc2.fsf@posteo.net> <20171225000310.GA1014@jasmine.lan> <87k1xawye9.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43202) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eTWG7-00088a-L2 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Dec 2017 12:09:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eTWG2-0006ez-Ih for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Dec 2017 12:09:51 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:53717) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eTWG2-0006eA-By for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Dec 2017 12:09:46 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC57120DE2 for ; Mon, 25 Dec 2017 18:09:44 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87k1xawye9.fsf@posteo.net> (Kei Kebreau's message of "Mon, 25 Dec 2017 11:44:14 -0500") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Kei Kebreau writes: > Leo Famulari writes: > >> On Sun, Dec 24, 2017 at 06:16:29PM -0500, Kei Kebreau wrote: >>> I've attempted to use the upstream patch, but it involves some GIT >>> binaries which aren't supported by GNU patch. Among other hackish >>> options, temporarily upgrading to the appropriate upstream commit may >>> fix this for now. >> >> Does it work if you pass '--binary' to patch-flags? > > It does not. Maybe I could use 'diff --binary' to patch the files into > existence? Using 'diff --text' on the non-text files seems to work. The patch file is encoded as 'raw-text' according to Emacs. Please take a look at our bug #29849. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEg7ZwOtzKO2lLzi2m5qXuPBlGeg0FAlpBMMMACgkQ5qXuPBlG eg3BVQ/7BURmMhYKyiSlmDTRQf5XADFUSbbleBNz3o6yvIxfcbx9gdaTfyHxq5CL BonmhH3sX1VqBfLGoeG/NLUo0+YSmh8AyBmaw2UXYv3aM+y/TeVE1rgavr/5MZBC jrG9FW3hCft5I4XL1d+ie0FHSuCM921Z2K5uL6QYpinTG/7ouXdZSQ/Mj7yLeXfI pejhX5/SSgWMLoktJViLO83ATj7K4G0DBP4aJxvMM9K7x/eL48RX23XoKtb9Sd49 5byeHpi2BTR6LnbuhiZYhhRLHZV5Xnq1IlZl93yiE/F1C6iNtwUxb2wubqRxbpXa PnaVMLETROMCII8Df5TscndDTf9kIhnPftCQe1xVMazFiJT9uBlwdjnjp9rlX4N+ 1AkL0wNFBQvGddbN7dTc/rTGruem93fgvVzZ/auVAHO+C+9OPnPDbMR4+6B9qKs4 vG9ntfbUix2OiRtvVzVF05OX44Y6/bXg/BtTZ1gV41KGovLGYwi4JE1obnITFiUC Hr35WMUdPF8slZevmIaFVjVEIFw5kDJ9rQbN2cyhAFSLAroEtdZuJ9MAoXkkoYOn JTaMJgAQh/XvLcPOX9pfEPZPUF4MB4+gT/xAYplxCka2upxKOElkjV69T8NLM5J/ ykBYa6wKSu4J/qPbFt2VdOP0iFRpOg0QVs7Ee54uj8fA9iE8SF8= =JljB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--