From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kei Kebreau Subject: Re: invoke instead of (system* ... Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 22:39:54 -0500 Message-ID: <87fu7awho5.fsf@posteo.net> References: <20180112193526.GA3541@jasmine.lan> <20180113005058.3hqzwgl35tbhbwfr@abyayala> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34976) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eaCgH-0003B0-DU for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 22:40:30 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eaCgC-0000Df-Ed for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 22:40:29 -0500 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:40386) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eaCgC-0008Tw-0j for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jan 2018 22:40:24 -0500 Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C28AD20ED8 for ; Sat, 13 Jan 2018 04:40:14 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20180113005058.3hqzwgl35tbhbwfr@abyayala> (ng0@n0.is's message of "Sat, 13 Jan 2018 00:50:58 +0000") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ng0 writes: > Leo Famulari transcribed 1.4K bytes: >> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 08:16:40PM +0100, Catonano wrote: >> > recently I read that we should move to using this invoke procedure ins= tead > > Could you tell me where you've read this? It's news to me aswell. > You can check out this thread: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-12/msg00278.html >> > of the (system* some-script) in defining little scripts in packages and >> > services definitions >> >=20 >> > But I can't remember where exactly >> >=20 >> > Where is this invoke procedure defined ? >>=20 >> It's in guix/build/utils.scm --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEg7ZwOtzKO2lLzi2m5qXuPBlGeg0FAlpZf4oACgkQ5qXuPBlG eg29Lw//QYDxCX5jmDC7VTPz+3DbT09CYEX81lsKCvRA8B+IkZvnTqyNbTgBS/9j z2wnXs6tNzC/nDQYt/gTjRfICt+qbUMKc3q5TOF+O2VyaqUx4ruDCTIG+tNHKSq2 CvnwbmcNR6BnWUGAPEoRLKj+8fLiqC9Qz5WqL1Q0kZoNkN0qFQotUTGsgjuFiz0/ D6ORph+1k3CR1yK2ABqIZH27zxnbNFUWCH6Y03XGUjopnsbfp2QBnm22VR0lJKf1 2Ct62TDy7WHsF33LFO56r5VewYPs4oXICjifKfCJRbPxphRDjXsFVD/pysj08xCV wJ9ts07p5G4VFuMMAp61pLdOBHKD2dUvyhR6AC+HzF287OP4gzFj0jWM7SzngYT8 jWd2h8DpkLovbwhuk5eTd52LzEegI2Dk96YFraBE40x03xkgX3FQdly3A9iGlFvb YJbo9RB8m+GQotYTuugoyqLlD/lIAr/BjBjiXdJlds/Dh0ZOoY0eNfUFAlhi1wnT gyO6Ta2RsjFhZ/ZdF63pCgoah+zTtHp9pqTtBK0qwQo8rJeqB1QMSI1GL/QcOJMB WmsveZEUQACusIZaga1dZg7v/DUYZfanoVm62bpXt/W32NnlFZ44EP0NwYQjrisV 3lypteYDBJwZRuFOTb89Rz0mWnaTCxHNnYweQ97WHu2M6wOus14= =LFtc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--