From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: bug#25356: livestreamer no longer supported Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 07:47:20 +0100 Message-ID: <87fu6nsv0n.fsf@elephly.net> References: <20170104160538.GA10030@khaalida> <87mvf6u0bd.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <20170104202812.GD7042@jasmine> <20170428151839.pthpac5rsvp36e5q@abyayala> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47938) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1egPiD-00051z-4R for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 01:48:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1egPi9-0008Ts-6L for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 01:48:09 -0500 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21137) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1egPi8-0008TE-Ti for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 01:48:05 -0500 In-reply-to: <20170428151839.pthpac5rsvp36e5q@abyayala> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: ng0 Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org ng0 writes: > Leo Famulari transcribed 0.7K bytes: >> On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 06:50:14PM +0000, ng0 wrote: >> > Do I read this correctly that they include some kind of >> > anti-military license in there? I mean I am very much welcoming >> > such an exclusion but with all the past discussions I had it lead >> > to the point where it is not compatible with free software. >> > >> > Do we have to strip OCB from the source? >> > https://github.com/Legrandin/pycryptodome/blob/master/LICENSE.rst >> > >> > Pycryptodome is a dependency of streamlink. >> >> The question is about the OCB block cipher mode. I think we are able to >> distribute implementations of it: >> >> http://web.cs.ucdavis.edu/~rogaway/ocb/ocb-faq.htm#patent:phil >> http://web.cs.ucdavis.edu/~rogaway/ocb/ocb-faq.htm#license >> http://web.cs.ucdavis.edu/~rogaway/ocb/license.htm >> > > With regards to this bug, can someone help to get the facts clear here > so that we know what needs to be done to package streamlink? See also the copyright file that Debian have written: http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs/main/p/pycryptodome/py= cryptodome_3.4.7-1_copyright License 1 applies to free software implementations. That=E2=80=99s already enough for us. License 2 applies to non-free implementations. There the author distinguishes between non-military and military uses. License 3 is an explicit grant for OpenSSL. -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net