ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:

> Hello Marius & all,
>
> Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> skribis:
>
>> Good idea.  It would be good to clarify that this also applies for
>> 'staging'.  What do you think about this instead?
>>
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> doc/contributing.texi | 11 +++++++++--
>
> The patch LGTM!
>
>> +@c TODO: It would be good with badges on the website that tracks these
>> +@c branches.  Or maybe even a status page.
>
> I agree!  I admit I sometimes have a hard time determining the current
> status of every branch (for instance I’m not sure what’s up with
> ‘staging’ at the moment…)

I'm thinking we could have regular cycles (say every two weeks).  But
given the load on Hydra in general, we probably have to wait until
Cuirass provides the same functionality.

I pushed the documentation update as 38ab778fbd676fe7f7a84220d0cf7f474573dc2b.