From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Pierre Neidhardt <mail@ambrevar.xyz>
Subject: Re: Parameterized packages
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 12:44:01 +0100
Message-ID: <87ftghhrlq.fsf@ambrevar.xyz>
References: <87woitz1xx.fsf@gnu.org> <87o945vze5.fsf@nckx>
 <8736ldq74z.fsf@netris.org> <20190719202906.lbanx5puk7t6q4cr@cf0>
 <87a7753boq.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87h813wah0.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
 micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42070)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1irh5m-0002NC-Df
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 06:44:13 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <mail@ambrevar.xyz>) id 1irh5i-0007zS-KV
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Jan 2020 06:44:10 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87h813wah0.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel"
 <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> That=E2=80=99s another good example of a problem that would arise.  :-/
> It doesn=E2=80=99t seem reasonable to me to add complex logic in (guix pa=
ckages)
> to deal with this issue; I would very much prefer to leave input
> handling unchanged.

To be clear, what do you mean with "input handling"?

=2D-=20
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl4e+wEACgkQm9z0l6S7
zH/V6wgApZ4Ywtrdx+kjP5GXWmA4T7RlknZ75saPze2+ND+s8XNSeuYldg8Z3O0W
YhU0qcuAyCIR/IUeoy++n3RkBZgKEgWDOBU0RXhjuJaP/bt6k/kYp9YY4Ox2y96i
PGfrGOQiKVT6VVIY6ViOF++HsO65S/iuOfX5w0PPKiMKX1hTzikhiaISdGf7NGDx
wpPn+6V/Szkm44zlxX+9lNfzh/njWlUzNEQfKlL7lKaxrwCriShB02DRUZAz45az
J/STmv/z/XddVKlGHQL3JFbEoUEtLgWuo1AmiDIKawiEybI+dPQfrlEkjgaORlM7
bWBbspBi2bMFZ6em8wKtgQXiPLqpug==
=Bl7T
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--