From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id aOqON9U2xV7OZQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 13:55:33 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id AKZTM9U2xV5dFQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 13:55:33 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13FF19403ED for ; Wed, 20 May 2020 13:55:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:41954 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbPC0-0000OD-3J for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 20 May 2020 09:55:32 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53140) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbPBr-0000O4-LQ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2020 09:55:23 -0400 Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:40353) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbPBq-0007rI-Kt for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2020 09:55:23 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id E48165C00A5; Wed, 20 May 2020 09:55:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 20 May 2020 09:55:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.com; h= from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=fm2; bh=3nsFfG1gNYAf1viIMauv4vOHS4 13TwtH/h94GIwXrQk=; b=lqTzjE2z2WNTnMSMRifuS9wE2V67UkfiHz/ahjqwE9 96byZP2/AS2RLekcYziQ0Nxg/AS86Cdhqbv5OM9hrlND43Erc1qtXtWP1bkhgQBK JGN4EpdjpH2CRnuiQmj5mS5lBofxmiVEwdE7YNrYBsp+bSUy+hR4fuXH3zLXeUF1 hOnd7imnwPnwO8oPJ02tETSOmsjibLdczVRCX3LWT2yZEBwKWDSGF9r5DMzSQ7ja YPFuRCskqq83ZUnvxTSdMKeM5cqvn1U6ptyya8bVw9uuNPn6phvm5kWEMtkgQ06G 3694JjATM1mGSo0DKDN8UgAvMtmFHQpoj81RZ2D0MclA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=3nsFfG 1gNYAf1viIMauv4vOHS413TwtH/h94GIwXrQk=; b=e7MKf8dhP39PBJZweCGvwX Ap5lAAuf42lHsOB1O6zGeplmRddiX0hcDLtCgx94qAoEAG1XyxQvZItl6uyjGONM otcIrvFbMoPYmxyZ2U776A2qJNtJ26JQ5AHtOEQvLIVw7P42p2YRYBEEXFpZ2BJ2 6LrhytpNr6DXm3trZyvX14WL98csYDoki1M/xkZYeN2wWYcXjHL3JOfyud3bUq5T zvYh13deNFQxAvbN69zsXcjwfAEk0R8jtcCNfAwy016IzXcqGuQctbGwyb0PVxFL 384mJGeFDIhuHzGZ9enycnTJsnHu4ht2ItjaZXVGCwfLeOy9rEYPmCk0hDT7dm3A == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedruddtledgieelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufgjfhgffffkgggtsehgtderredtredtnecuhfhrohhmpeforghrihhu shcuuegrkhhkvgcuoehmsggrkhhkvgesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrg htthgvrhhnpedugfffieeuhffhheetteeffeeilefhueelueejheejgeekjefgfeduffdu uefgkeenucffohhmrghinhepghhnohhmvgdrohhrghdpghhnuhdrohhrghenucfkphepke egrddvtddvrdeikedrjeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehm rghilhhfrhhomhepmhgsrghkkhgvsehfrghsthhmrghilhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (ti0006q161-2604.bb.online.no [84.202.68.75]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7A83A3066448; Wed, 20 May 2020 09:55:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Marius Bakke To: zimoun Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: fontconfig: Add replacement with font-dejavu instead of gs-fonts. In-Reply-To: References: <20200517145012.21532-1-mbakke@fastmail.com> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.29.3 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/26.3 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 15:55:13 +0200 Message-ID: <87ftbubtj2.fsf@devup.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=66.111.4.25; envelope-from=mbakke@fastmail.com; helo=out1-smtp.messagingengine.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/20 03:21:30 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix Devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=fastmail.com header.s=fm2 header.b=lqTzjE2z; dkim=pass header.d=messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=e7MKf8dh; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=fastmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -3.81 X-TUID: RJHzWkJa5wz1 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain zimoun writes: > Apparently, there is different fonts on master and core-updates, if yes why? The only known difference since the core-updates merge is that applications using Pango (e.g. GTK+) no longer recognizes bitmap fonts. https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/pango/issues/386 > I mean, on my machine -- Guix on the top of Debian with font-dejavu > installed -- why does commit 4bdf4182fe (core-update merge) not > display correctly and the parent commit c81457a588 too but the other > parent commit 23a59b180b displays nicely? Leo reported problems with fonts on Debian in , but said that fonts installed with Guix still worked. I don't know what could cause it to fail on your system. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl7FNsEACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPpmfAf9FiwfXjMtVgyZz0snm+WtBsYvwQ+h4BIBWOjU40Yh33HPzJBOYzNu9QFl ZcxZkvNnM5kg+1uw7Z/sLZrU+bnp7AbUb/yX22d5MFTgY9q5kJwNaFT4dAiceW6M 2xKjIFVKsl+z5sKJRY6FwEEVTL6MmyIMd564I3ciDsak3kubebfJPiOED2Rb+bwC fyqqkasx2L4mNLgfpsXCtpQQjPYxn6o+Ax/+XWcgBV2NOuU5gPnALTxkT8ce93OV py5bjVfuk83Z7vcAhAWDqrt3lL0kGi+U4bEhy81CcfCEF/6B2zBPHLP+7G91ekU3 mw/jXhCGa9yqElKdquWigU33vBc43Q== =Yx/Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--