From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id YMZSHd6Jx15rNwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 08:14:22 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id +EsgGd6Jx16RewAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 08:14:22 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1873E9403EA for ; Fri, 22 May 2020 08:14:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:37862 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jc2ou-0002vU-Un for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 22 May 2020 04:14:20 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45712) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jc2ol-0002ui-Da for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2020 04:14:11 -0400 Received: from relay6-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.198]:34367) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jc2oi-0007pG-EJ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2020 04:14:10 -0400 X-Originating-IP: 78.248.96.161 Received: from mimimi (mqu44-1-78-248-96-161.fbx.proxad.net [78.248.96.161]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz) by relay6-d.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04CF7C0008; Fri, 22 May 2020 08:14:01 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt To: Katherine Cox-Buday Subject: Re: Can we increase the print width/column in daemon backtraces In-Reply-To: <878shlczfd.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87tvbn7ff3.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87k1cjihvm.fsf@elephly.net> <87h87n78yf.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87muf38yzh.fsf@gmail.com> <87k117x9m7.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <878shlczfd.fsf@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 10:14:00 +0200 Message-ID: <87ftbscrp3.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.183.198; envelope-from=mail@ambrevar.xyz; helo=relay6-d.mail.gandi.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/05/22 04:14:03 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer X-Spam_score_int: -25 X-Spam_score: -2.6 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -0.61 X-TUID: SlaYMrCLQkJU --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It's Guile, not Guix. But I suppose we could start the Guix daemon while making sure the backtraces are not truncated. =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl7HicgACgkQm9z0l6S7 zH9dZwf/fuwfuyX4W0Y5PScv6IpbXiCC/T35RKdvsHIefyfjbkptYeIi6LhuEczY 9XNM4yMzjF7e1x99fmCygMkpqhVVzYMsNt5LfjDp+bnxb7OX5oU+hV61UD5Wu7aD baz1sC7H3tfimTPfaKa2PrWKPQTCaBk51F9Fe5ur25lFoIlWCEwbw1cQ7Q1WCeEK uRLJqN3+dZxtgPYPMUGrm4ts5svABYFYa4sABK1VTRm0PSN2e5UIdeSs4wat+4mC 36bTB0OWkgFtsaFb/Zn0X4TJaq11hxbgmfWkgFDkHtBBRu//pDmzxF90lW+HPr3x wgYay0vGDE43oJIFBqS7KTtfcHeFTg== =HWYr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--