From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id mKVtGKkxy1/zeQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 07:07:21 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id oBI3FKkxy18XWgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 07:07:21 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2A589401BF for ; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 07:07:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:57580 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klRf5-0004A8-Nt for larch@yhetil.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 02:07:19 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44848) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klRep-00049z-Gb for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 02:07:03 -0500 Received: from world.peace.net ([64.112.178.59]:36118) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klRel-0006fM-Lj for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 02:07:03 -0500 Received: from mhw by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1klRej-0005We-Ce; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 02:06:57 -0500 From: Mark H Weaver To: Raghav Gururajan , Ryan Prior , Danny Milosavljevic Subject: Re: Questionable "cosmetic changes" commits In-Reply-To: <87im9g4ukt.fsf@netris.org> References: <87im9g4ukt.fsf@netris.org> Date: Sat, 05 Dec 2020 02:06:08 -0500 Message-ID: <87ft4k4tqc.fsf@netris.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=64.112.178.59; envelope-from=mhw@netris.org; helo=world.peace.net X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.29 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: D2A589401BF X-Spam-Score: -2.29 X-Migadu-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu X-TUID: P7kDz3oSwkAX I wrote: > I just hacked up a little script to determine which ordering is more > common. For simplicity, it only considers top-level declarations of the > form (define-public (package ...)). To be more precise, it only considers packages of that form where the '...' contains both 'home-page' and 'description' fields, so it excludes most packages that inherit from another package. Mark