From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp10.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:478a::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id kCz0DS36tGSzRgAASxT56A (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 10:22:05 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:478a::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp10.migadu.com with LMTPS id 0PEIDS36tGQXYAAAG6o9tA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 10:22:05 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D38884A65F for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 10:22:04 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none ("invalid DKIM record") header.d=msavoritias.me header.s=20210930 header.b="C8blP/j/"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=msavoritias.me (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1689582125; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=Cq/2TvOFoIXOugtAVLVZpta3hufioEGV9yk3xtG4qKOeTL+sbh7N3kwVMSZuhi3A9QZS/e Neohah7xgcwFNphMs0nbTvuFljVI6qpxYeSLAhEcFHdxEQ8GmNb1bPE9Mz7+919Cwngwxi GaQfT2bGoJyqB8XLTki3E4nxE/NeNaJBiIKDfXtSC9Dk9Z+ohwSeFvofQIJoakoVlvcLDG 03L1FmIGnNX0q9TWtAvJHJDcSpTO0oKzaqQYS5w7QH4O8JT2wnrTSzGdObKv4pqu8nVWq7 bmQePGNyh/acI4vr51FQIEUZsRPnAhS8YPWyHhE7GnrrAxhxvNzxhMFFhI0ljw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none ("invalid DKIM record") header.d=msavoritias.me header.s=20210930 header.b="C8blP/j/"; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=msavoritias.me (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1689582125; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=i2ML5wBkOo4x8vGAMAecjHcf/NQmoCW3fpiY516UI4M=; b=hXKxBBS0oBCnOrC8cLHnm40Z0leUwaNFibmSnb1IK28p/XqLVWbi9q2rV5HI/BtbkdV1mb EymaMH3uHGlsVxLdwGb+45IR7cMbMBUlEqbgD9KpRuu1uJNdjV6imFDYTYBF7XW/iL8b4V QaF6JzLTuiRip3M29jShb+IHpeDHYZQG7RSGDx9QDKBUi807AcTDx2Ie1FBmQKKtILx6zb 3Kpz7oasSJKKDyEdG7rVGMfZ4zUiI/Fo7ynHCX263tBBuTwPUjft24LhjX5Y05hNBXMWo2 yDKVcyO2nfcbGOZEXmkgMmTiDTKS4z7cqg7XyEAFOb63Jxzg5H8AA8JaUMDk9w== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qLJUB-00023O-Tg; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 04:21:39 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qLJUA-00022z-8n for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 04:21:38 -0400 Received: from mail.webarch.email ([81.95.52.48]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qLJU3-0003oR-DW for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 04:21:38 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id 921151A8C808 for ; Mon, 17 Jul 2023 09:21:14 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=msavoritias.me; s=20210930; t=1689582076; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=i2ML5wBkOo4x8vGAMAecjHcf/NQmoCW3fpiY516UI4M=; b=C8blP/j/M+NmPmfEdDvudjpSJ167rPnfS7OMhjUYXnLiPBk+J/fWc1fL4wwTs8bRIahkSZ UMLnTNITG+kMfYNuFKpjc81PLANwwqNMRXRAFPf3qdsLsZ9JWNt8l58VBV1zH4uGomW+wA yemb4WpAPYW8y0lyuBsqkXrCu3XRm5fGXJTh7ifcvDWbyDXabzY4W4Obx69YbPh40rkQQ7 3Kv686p9yobMP721yIbF9z6QhYLQ5QS6UMd07U2cUZNnjs6eIARcZ0zP4jxZlDsKkb3ONu xN+5Hc277vEaQeqvuSwfZ9sVnvI75r8faW/ZH+yf6BLvUn6Yh9ZqdEAF/NQKeg== References: <87sf9r6gmp.fsf@robbyzambito.me> <20230716103340.iy2ton3oxcc4kuqc@thebird.nl> <87mszvf0is.fsf@elephly.net> User-agent: mu4e 1.10.4; emacs 28.2 From: MSavoritias To: guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: A Forum for Guix Users Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2023 11:17:50 +0300 In-reply-to: <87mszvf0is.fsf@elephly.net> Message-ID: <87fs5nosnh.fsf@fannys.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 Received-SPF: pass client-ip=81.95.52.48; envelope-from=email@msavoritias.me; helo=mail.webarch.email X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Scanner: mx0.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -3.14 X-Spam-Score: -3.14 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: D38884A65F X-TUID: 2Ls38sFtwpOG Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Pjotr Prins writes: > >> If the xapian indexer also analysed mailing list output (through >> publicinbox, for example) and maybe debbugs and IRC logs it would be >> complete.=20 > > It does index the IRC logs, but there=E2=80=99s a bug in the deployment: > > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/maintenance.git/tree/hydra/gog= gles.scm#n56 > >>> 5. Substitute availability is good, but download speeds can be poor >>> due to peering issues. >> >> That is a matter of money, I guess. > > Peering issues can only be avoided by distributing the artifacts to many > different locations. We=E2=80=99ve previously paid for distribution via = AWS, > which was rather expensive. > > It might be better to revive the distribution over IPFS. Isn't it worked on still? My understanding was that we are waiting for: 1. ERIS to happen -> https://eris.codeberg.page/ which is here -> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/52555 2. and also https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:Guix/GSoC-2023 which uses ERIS. Not sure if it has been picked up yet. I dont follow gsoc closely.