From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Raimon Grau Subject: Re: luajit recipe Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 01:11:32 +0100 Message-ID: <87eh3hxfpn.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87iosulff2.fsf@gmail.com> <52F1948E.1080308@gmail.com> <87bnyl8y2g.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40783) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBCZN-0005Mg-Fw for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 19:11:59 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBCZH-0003RO-Ly for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 19:11:53 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:35198) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WBCZH-0003Qc-Fr for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Feb 2014 19:11:47 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WBCZG-0002rZ-2u for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 01:11:46 +0100 Received: from 84.red-88-19-116.staticip.rima-tde.net ([88.19.116.84]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 01:11:46 +0100 Received: from raimonster by 84.red-88-19-116.staticip.rima-tde.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 01:11:46 +0100 List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Cyril Roelandt skribis: > >> I think you should add this package to gnu/packages/lua.scm rather >> than creating a new file. > > Indeed, I had forgotten about that file. > > Raimon: could you post an updated patch that does that? > > Ludo’. The releases of one or the other are not synched at all, and there's fewer and fewer relation between both implementations, but it probably makes sense to have them in the same file (as in scheme.scm). Will do the modifications and send the patch. Thanks for your inputs!