From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH] profiles: Report about upgrades. Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2014 21:37:08 +0200 Message-ID: <87egvr89ej.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87k3719v7p.fsf@gmail.com> <87r419fa50.fsf@gnu.org> <87fvho9fqm.fsf@gmail.com> <87a97taixl.fsf@gmail.com> <87sil2rbly.fsf@gnu.org> <87tx5idn7f.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <87egwlkcy1.fsf@gnu.org> <87ppg5el2i.fsf@gmail.com> <87d2c5h4if.fsf@gnu.org> <87lhqsev1d.fsf@gmail.com> <877g2c74xh.fsf@gnu.org> <87ha1gds3w.fsf@gmail.com> <878umqe1wm.fsf@gmail.com> <87egwgokco.fsf@gnu.org> <87d2bvcqfx.fsf_-_@gmail.com> <87bnr1bvkt.fsf@gnu.org> <87egvxkxey.fsf@gmail.com> <87bnr04ekz.fsf@gnu.org> <87a96jlsnm.fsf@gmail.com> <87iol5olh8.fsf@gnu.org> <87egvrke1z.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44138) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPcqS-0001R4-MB for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:37:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPcqE-0002xE-Gd for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:37:24 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a01:474::1]:58709) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XPcqE-0002x7-9b for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 04 Sep 2014 15:37:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87egvrke1z.fsf@gmail.com> (Alex Kost's message of "Thu, 04 Sep 2014 12:03:36 +0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Alex Kost Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Alex Kost skribis: > Great! I really like it and that =E2=80=98right-arrow=E2=80=99 is cool :) :-) > There is just one thing (that shouldn't be mentioned): > > + (lambda (key . args) > + ">"))))) > > I would make it "->". IMHO it is more "understandable" as such > combination is used in output of some shell commands (like =E2=80=9Cmv -v= =E2=80=9D or > =E2=80=9Ccp -v=E2=80=9D). Makes sense. Done. > But that's a terrible nitpick and it should be ignored. There=E2=80=99s no such thing as terrible nitpicking. :-) Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.