From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add mesa-demos. Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 15:41:14 +0100 Message-ID: <87egoqqq5x.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87egos7wfs.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> <87oanvy8je.fsf@gnu.org> <87a8zf7hj9.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> <8761a37h8m.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43184) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YX9jE-0003TS-Px for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 10:41:21 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YX9jB-0004Sl-K7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 10:41:20 -0400 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:52582) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YX9jB-0004Sh-HC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 10:41:17 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8761a37h8m.fsf@taylan.uni.cx> ("Taylan Ulrich \=\?utf-8\?Q\?\=5C\=22Bay\=C4\=B1rl\=C4\=B1\=2FKammer\=5C\=22\=22's\?\= message of "Sat, 14 Mar 2015 16:04:25 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Taylan Ulrich =?utf-8?Q?=22Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1?= =?utf-8?Q?=2FKammer=22?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer") skribis: > taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer") writes: > >>>> + ("libxshmfence" ,libxshmfence) >>> >>> Please add a margin comment explaining the reason. >> >> It's in the "Requires.private" field of the gl.pc pkg-config file. The >> same seems to be the case for other packages in the propagated-inputs >> list. Should it be explained for all of them?.. > > I just noticed that there's more packages in that .pc section which are > in the inputs but not propagated inputs. Should I propagate them all? Yes, I think so. > So I think libxshmfence and libxfixes should be propagated, right? Right. A single comment above =E2=80=98propagated-inputs=E2=80=99 saying that all = of them are in the .pc is enough. Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.