From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark H Weaver Subject: Re: 01/01: gnu: Add gst-libav. Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:14:07 -0400 Message-ID: <87egnorx0g.fsf@netris.org> References: <20150410130205.11406.56090@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40224) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YheBX-0007sy-Ap for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:13:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YheBR-0006da-35 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:13:55 -0400 Received: from world.peace.net ([50.252.239.5]:34786) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YheBQ-0006ax-VY for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 13 Apr 2015 09:13:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: (iyzsong@gmail.com's message of "Fri, 10 Apr 2015 13:02:06 +0000") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix-devel@gnu.org =E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6 writes: > commit 1b922590d758e458ce4f9abd3d1694045bcccb58 > Author: =E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6 > Date: Fri Apr 10 21:01:10 2015 +0800 > > gnu: Add gst-libav. >=20=20=20=20=20 > * gnu/packages/gstreamer.scm (gst-libav): New variable. Can we add gst-ffmpeg and remove gst-libav? It seems that ffmpeg has won out in the ffmpeg/libav fork. https://lwn.net/Articles/607591/ Also, can we make it use the system ffmpeg library that we already have instead of a bundled copy? It would be good to avoid code duplication for several reasons. Code duplication means more memory use in the system, and more importantly, it means multiple copies of the software to patch when investigating and applying security updates or build fixes for Guix, fixes for non-Intel platforms, etc. As the person who seems to be doing almost all of the work on non-Intel platforms and most of the security updates, I'd strongly prefer to minimize that workload. What do you think? Mark