From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH] system: grub: On MIPS, the linux image name is vmlinuz Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 21:21:47 +0100 Message-ID: <87eggcayzo.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a8thx3l5.fsf@netris.org> <87pp28whqu.fsf@gnu.org> <87io5savhn.fsf@gnu.org> <87wpu71uqo.fsf@netris.org> <87ziz39vfc.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40966) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZsGBN-0004HI-V1 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:21:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZsGBK-0006QX-Qw for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 16:21:53 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87ziz39vfc.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Wed, 28 Oct 2015 10:47:19 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Mark H Weaver Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) skribis: > Regarding linux-libre-loongson2f: Are the patches available elsewhere? > I figured we might as well refer to them using an =E2=80=98origin=E2=80= =99 if there=E2=80=99s a > stable location we can use. Another issue: I changed the GRUB upgrade to use a more recent commit, which includes the two MIPS patches that are used in wip-loongson2f. However, GRUB fails one test on x86_64: --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- FAIL: grub_func_test =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D ./grub_func_test: line 17: /gnu/store/mnwjrkbfzkb5ifhqf8hssf3cxfvg11l6-core= utils-8.24/bin/tail: Argument list too long Functional test failure: shift_test: shift_test: PASS [...] tests/video_checksum.c:checksum:620: assert failed: 0 Checksum videotest_6= 40x480xi16:1 failed: 0x1368a483 vs 0x7f1853ba tests/video_checksum.c:checksum:620: assert failed: 0 Checksum videotest_6= 40x480xi16:0 failed: 0x1368a483 vs 0x7f1853ba videotest_checksum: FAIL --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- The video test failure is a showstopper I think, and it would require quite a bit of work to investigate. Do you think you could help with these two things? Otherwise we can just postpone GuixSD/mips64el to the next release. TIA, Ludo=E2=80=99.