From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christopher Allan Webber Subject: Re: Staying on top of Qt security Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:53:40 -0800 Message-ID: <87egc9pr2p.fsf@dustycloud.org> References: <20160214200143.GA19744@jasmine> <20160218204349.GA4179@solar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59617) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWXT8-000218-3R for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:54:42 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWXT7-0002AN-AB for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:54:42 -0500 Received: from dustycloud.org ([2600:3c02::f03c:91ff:feae:cb51]:47866) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aWXT7-0002AJ-31 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:54:41 -0500 In-reply-to: <20160218204349.GA4179@solar> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Andreas Enge writes: > Chris, what about pumpa? I'm assuming this was directed at me (though I don't work on Pumpa, but I could ask the author things... I do *use* it every day though). What am I being asked here... I'm not sure? Whether Pumpa could be updated to QT 5?