From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: st: Mov to terminals.scm.
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 08:28:33 +0000
Message-ID: <87eg5u75n2.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
References: <871t20ahcb.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<87y44892ku.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is>
	<87r39zmldt.fsf@member.fsf.org> <874m6vc5mx.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87fuqeq2em.fsf@netris.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46414)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>) id 1bYEUT-00030T-0Q
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 11:35:22 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is>) id 1bYEUQ-0007DP-SD
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 11:35:19 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87fuqeq2em.fsf@netris.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>, Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Hi,

Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> writes:

> Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@gnu.org> writes:
>
>> iyzsong@member.fsf.org (宋文武) writes:
>>
>>> ng0 <ng0@we.make.ritual.n0.is> writes:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I think it's pointless to have a suckless.scm which bundles all software
>>>> which just happens to follow suckless ideology/goals or be hosted
>>>> there.
>>>> That's why I did not commit ii to suckless but to irc.scm, no one will
>>>> look into suckless.scm when what they really are looking for is not
>>>> $suckless but application xy.
>>>> I try to unbundle and remove suckless.scm with the next patches.
>>>
>>> Well, it's difficult to choose the "right" category for packages.
>>> For example, 'dmenu' shouldn't go to 'wm.scm', it has nothing to
>>> do with window managers.
>>>
>>> When a project makes multiple softwares, I think it's easier to
>>> put all of them in one project file, eg: gnome and freedesktop.
>>
>> So you are in favour of keeping (gnu packages suckless)?
>
> Fwiw, I'm in favor of keeping suckless.scm, and rejecting these proposed
> package moves.
>
>      Mark
>

Thanks for the comments, I did not see your replies until today.

Okay, I'd say with your replied that we do not move it.
The latest update of st I did in suckless.scm, so anyone who wants to
update that can aply the patch.

-- 
♥Ⓐ  ng0
For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org