From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Specifying Java version when using ant-build-system
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2016 11:17:23 +0200
Message-ID: <87eg56pqe4.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20160815161734.43f11abd@scratchpost.org>
	<87h9am14cm.fsf@elephly.net> <20160816003802.GC16946@jasmine>
	<87eg5p16xi.fsf@elephly.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60440)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1befAj-0005jk-DF
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 05:17:34 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1befAc-0006UO-TQ
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Aug 2016 05:17:32 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87eg5p16xi.fsf@elephly.net> (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Tue,
	16 Aug 2016 09:58:33 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> skribis:

> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 04:42:01PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>>> > (define* (ant-build store name inputs
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> >                     (guile #f)p
>>> >                               ^^^ what does this mean?
>>>=20
>>> Ouch!  This shouldn=E2=80=99t have been committed.  This is what happen=
ed pretty
>>> often with my terrible keyboard at work =E2=80=94 my control key (among=
 many
>>> other keys) wasn=E2=80=99t very reliable and would sometimes stop worki=
ng while
>>> I moved around in the sources in Emacs (where Ctrl+p moves up one
>>> line).
>>
>> Can we correct the typo on the master branch? It seems that only a few
>> packages are using the ant-build-system for now, although I didn't check
>> if those packages have a lot of referrers.
>
> Yes, it wouldn=E2=80=99t cause too many rebuilds.

It wouldn=E2=80=99t cause *any* rebuilds because it=E2=80=99s host-side cod=
e.

It=E2=80=99s funny that the typo was in a place where it had no noticeable
effect (it just added an unused #:p parameter.)

Ludo=E2=80=99.