From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ng0 Subject: Re: New python build system merged Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2016 13:58:02 +0000 Message-ID: <87eg1thxxx.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> References: <58383346.5090608@crazy-compilers.com> <20161126044853.GB15256@jasmine> <583BF716.2060009@crazy-compilers.com> <87d1hfd8p8.fsf@gnu.org> <583D503D.6050209@crazy-compilers.com> <87k2bm745d.fsf@gnu.org> <583DC457.6060200@crazy-compilers.com> <87fum9n937.fsf@we.make.ritual.n0.is> <87oa0xkucz.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38906) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cC5Ox-0000Qa-05 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 08:58:26 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cC5Os-0008PK-Gg for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2016 08:58:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87oa0xkucz.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: guix-devel@gnu.org Ludovic Courtès writes: > ng0 skribis: > >> Hartmut Goebel writes: >> >>> Am 29.11.2016 um 15:27 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: >>>> Good. When you fix it (and other failures, if any), we can start a new >>>> evaluation or merge directly in master (the sooner the better!). >>> >>> Done. >>> >>> I'm very glad the new python build system is now in master. Thanks to >>> everybody who helped finishing this! >>> >>> -- >>> Regards >>> Hartmut Goebel >>> >>> | Hartmut Goebel | h.goebel@crazy-compilers.com | >>> | www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible | >> >> Great job! >> >> So should I fix up all my ~70 or how many there are python >> packages which I've sent in since september to get someone (or >> hopefully multiple someones) to review them? > > Please do ping people. Most likely the patch series fell into the > cracks and only you can remind people of it. Most likely, but there were also other issues. Like Harmut wanted to do gunicorn while I was working on it at some point, so I dropped that the series was forgotten. But I need to fix conflicts anyway. I guess I can send in most of them by sunday, there were also issues in many of the packages I need to address. When I do this before people start to work on them it's a bit easier to review as old issues aren't repeated. I think most of them were in version-control, python, networking, and it included the patches for kallithea, searx, and some other software. > I think Hartmut would be a good candidate to review them, Hartmut is our > Python expert now. :-) > > Ludo’. > -- ♥Ⓐ ng0 | ng0.chaosnet.org