From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] gnu: gcc@5: Make __DATE__ and __TIME__ macros
	reproducible.
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 20:56:57 +0100
Message-ID: <87efzt5z3q.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
References: <20170121113622.11721-1-mbakke@fastmail.com>
	<874m0sl9el.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-=";
	micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38410)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbakke@fastmail.com>) id 1cVkjf-0005ld-G9
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 14:57:04 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbakke@fastmail.com>) id 1cVkjc-0000Sv-C0
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 23 Jan 2017 14:57:03 -0500
In-Reply-To: <874m0sl9el.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

--=-=-=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

>> They *should* be functionally identical to Debians patches:
>>
>> https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/gcccvs/branches/sid/gcc-5/debian/patch=
es/
>>
>> ...but I have not verified this. Any takers?
>
> The =E2=80=98guix environment=E2=80=99 session you show is exactly how I =
would have
> tested it, so I don=E2=80=99t think there=E2=80=99s more to be tested, is=
 there?

Was mostly afraid to have missed something, but I could not spot any
differences :)

> I=E2=80=99d only keep the subject line of the patch rather than the compl=
ete
> log, to keep it small.  We have the upstream commit URL anyway.
>
> Apart from that, LGTM for =E2=80=98core-updates=E2=80=99.

OK, pushed with that change!

>
> Next we can remove all those __DATE__/__TIME__ snippets and dance!
>
> Thank you!
>
> Ludo=E2=80=99.

--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAliGYAkACgkQoqBt8qM6
VPqiNwgAzmM4ki2CKbmlD1mWbJKM47H4CLwwW50/0/4ouQwQEqfGkqkqZUSpEY6i
GwpKboZLHvFxYloZs6VZD0JuOeskzL2s6kGVHwD5DI+8h2lkUpDFvAObPsi2bI/s
jlr+NnS2Y7Kxpxax0eqsmSz5QTz6OxO5AKPbRhac9yPKBCyIMrsldfGTeUgLpFfR
6CnfLWYH0uVrYgC8zT0ZlLF3B3ouhJgHWwFDnssaTfDOuQxHjHWRvia3Ro51vWEv
QWntJWg7TE187lzpPb4Kps5yRGeTcGNxeZacIEG+/HP2/NAQRWl+j94vD+wcGMK5
rff4fIkoCfkfiVnykp2XQRX9s5GrTg==
=2dvl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--