From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: 01/01: guix: git: Add new module.
Date: Sat, 06 May 2017 14:39:26 +0200
Message-ID: <87efw2w45d.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <20170505175324.13769.79863@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
	<20170505175325.5D41920E7B@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
	<20170506001537.GA6293@jasmine> <8737ciwfvy.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37698)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1d6yzk-0003Cy-2j
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 May 2017 08:39:33 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1d6yzg-0002X3-VC
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 May 2017 08:39:32 -0400
In-Reply-To: <8737ciwfvy.fsf@gmail.com> (Mathieu Othacehe's message of "Sat,
	06 May 2017 10:25:53 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Hi,

Mathieu Othacehe <m.othacehe@gmail.com> skribis:

> Thanks for taking care of it.
>
>> I could not reproduce the failure when building "by hand", but since
>> `guix pull` is the primary method of updating Guix, I reverted this
>> change for now:
>
> I guess it is because in (guix build pull) every single file is
> builded, without take configure/makefile consigns into account.

Yes, see build-aux/build-self.scm.

> Except a horrible hack (an exception list in "build-guix"), I don't see
> how to deal with it. Maybe this commit shall be put on a branch or wait
> until guix switches to guile2.2.
>
> Ludo any thoughs ?

I plan to update =E2=80=98guix pull=E2=80=99 for Guile 2.2 before the relea=
se:

  https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2017-04/msg00515.html

When it=E2=80=99s done, we could add Guile-Git as an input when 2.2 is used=
, and
maybe add a special case for (guix git).

Thoughts?

Ludo=E2=80=99.