From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Subject: Re: Heads-up: transition to Guile 2.2 Date: Sun, 14 May 2017 18:28:01 +0200 Message-ID: <87efvr769a.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87bmt28qnm.fsf@gnu.org> <87k26chy16.fsf@gnu.org> <87y3u5wwsi.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <20170514135041.GA29369@thebird.nl> <20170514153506.GA29953@thebird.nl> <20170514161342.GA30265@thebird.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46130) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d9wNc-0002RB-1R for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 May 2017 12:28:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d9wNY-0005Ye-Uf for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 14 May 2017 12:28:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170514161342.GA30265@thebird.nl> (Pjotr Prins's message of "Sun, 14 May 2017 18:13:42 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Pjotr Prins Cc: guix-devel Pjotr Prins writes: > I rolled back all the way to March to get a reproducable stable > system again.=20 Ugh...I'm not sure what troubles you encountered. I have been using guile-2.2 for two years now; and have been "fighting" Guix's use of guile-2.0... Most troublesome is that some packages set GUILE_LOAD_PATH and GUILE_LOAD_COMPILED_PATH and mixing guile-2.0 and guile-2.2 packages that do so is still troublesome. It would be nice (TM) if we could find a way not to rely on setting those environment variables. Greetings, janneke --=20 Jan Nieuwenhuizen | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar=C2=AE http://AvatarAcademy.com