Re: Trouble with circular module dependencies (Re: 01/02: gnu: Add ncurses-with-gpm.)

[ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)]

Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> skribis:

> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> skribis:
>
>> Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> skribis:
>>
>>> FWIW, I would like to see us work to eliminate all cyclic module
>>> dependencies in Guix, by splitting up our package modules as needed so
>>> that they form a directed acyclic graph.
>>
>> This seems hard to achieve, unless we use one file per package.
>
> Are there drawbacks to using one file per package other than it’s a bit
> “heavy” due to all the boilerplate of license headers and module
> definitions?

It’d be less convenient for packagers, notably because you’d have to
specify all the modules to import, as you noted before.  We could work
around it with a ‘define-package-module’ macro that would lookup
packages with ‘specification->package’ or something like that.

There might be other implications, I’m not sure.

Ludo’.