From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: Video narration Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 20:49:31 +0200 Message-ID: <87ef6g1e4k.fsf@elephly.net> References: <660de50483d54150fa1ca67ebd0cae886d0ffcbe.camel@tourbillion-technology.com> <52a3d40df1ee349f48e7ecd79756e9307cbae034.camel@tourbillion-technology.com> <5893d6b8dc2dd4ed1cdcab3e109ce655d82bc493.camel@tourbillion-technology.com> <6f60665f899c24133818106831f378f087b9d405.camel@tourbillion-technology.com> <808a07682b858d44b1e48c69fd98fcb770837789.camel@tourbillion-technology.com> <0f4db135b01c57d8ab2fbf6721587664507dcefc.camel@tourbillion-technology.com> <3f393bb53fa8d04c0e9ae33df1eeadaf864940d5.camel@tourbillion-technology.com> <3ce59ef3d1e63fbc743ae0b71f317ef5916e0ccf.camel@tourbillion-technology.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52442) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hCVYd-0004Et-II for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2019 16:35:28 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hCVYZ-0005WS-N7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2019 16:35:25 -0400 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21282) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hCVYT-0005Mq-Ss for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2019 16:35:20 -0400 In-reply-to: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Laura Lazzati Cc: Guix-devel , Paul Garlick Laura Lazzati writes: >> Was there a reason for the difference? > My honest answer is: i don't know. This is probably my mistake. I didn=E2=80=99t pay much attention to frame = rates when I first built the scripts for generating the CLI videos. --=20 Ricardo