unofficial mirror of guix-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
To: Alex Griffin <a@ajgrf.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Guix beyond 1.0: let’s have a roadmap!
Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2019 16:09:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ef32aqcr.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42aa38f7-1414-4138-9f77-c0895ec19c77@www.fastmail.com> (Alex Griffin's message of "Mon, 01 Jul 2019 13:12:32 +0000")

Hi,

"Alex Griffin" <a@ajgrf.com> skribis:

> On Mon, Jul 1, 2019, at 10:06 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> > ** TODO run-time configuration system for services, similar to OpenWrt's UCI
>> 
>> What does it mean?  (I don’t know UCI.)
>
> UCI is a configuration language and tool layered on top of the underlying packages. It gives a single machine-readable configuration format to everything, and then uses it to generate the real config files used by services. It's the thing that lets you change your router settings from the OpenWrt web interface or command line.
>
> It's a lot like Guix system declarations, except service configuration happens at runtime. I guess the thing I really want though is a web interface.

Giovanni Biscuolo <g@xelera.eu> skribis:

> UCI [1] short description: «small utility written in C (a shell
> script-wrapper is available as well) and is intended to centralize the
> whole configuration of a device running OpenWrt.»
>
> How UCI works [2]:
> «Applications are made UCI-compatible by simply writing the original
> configuration file (which is read by the program) according to the
> chosen settings in the corresponding UCI file. This is done upon running
> the initialization scripts in /etc/init.d/. See Init scripts for more
> information. Thus, when starting a daemon with such a UCI-compatible
> initialization script, you should be aware that the program's original
> configuration file gets overwritten.»

Interesting!  Perhaps there are lessons to be learned from OpenWRT’s
experience building UCI and its web interface?  And also from Augeas.

>> > ** TODO support automatic GPG/signify signature verification of origin objects
>> 
>> For users or for packagers?
>
> For packagers. If a package ships with a cryptographic signature, we could commit it with the package and have Guix double check our source integrity. This would be especially helpful with `guix refresh`, because I suspect not everybody is as diligent about integrity checking when Guix just generates a working hash for you.

Note: s/integrity/authenticity/

‘guix refresh’ automatically checks OpenPGP signatures when they exist.

However, that authenticity check is necessarily out-of-band: there’s
nothing we can commit in Guix proper regarding that check.  The good
thing is that we have complete history of all the changes made to Guix,
so anyone can at any time authenticate the source code that Guix refers
to.

Perhaps what we could do is provide users with a tool to authenticate
the source code of specific packages, pretty much like ‘guix refresh’
does.

What’s more important, though, is authenticating checkouts of Guix
itself since it’s at the root of everything:
<https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/22883>.

Thanks,
Ludo’.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-07-07 14:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-27 16:05 Guix beyond 1.0: let’s have a roadmap! Ludovic Courtès
2019-06-27 16:36 ` P
2019-06-27 21:12   ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-06-27 17:06 ` Vagrant Cascadian
2019-06-27 21:17   ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-06-27 18:53 ` Jakob L. Kreuze
2019-06-27 21:18   ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-06-27 19:02 ` Alex Griffin
2019-06-27 22:33   ` swedebugia
2019-06-28  6:11     ` Julien Lepiller
2019-06-28 16:13       ` John Soo
2019-07-01  9:14         ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-07-01 11:57           ` Pierre Neidhardt
2019-07-07 14:15             ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-06-30 13:48   ` Giovanni Biscuolo
2019-07-01  9:16     ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-07-05  7:55       ` Giovanni Biscuolo
2019-07-01 10:05   ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-07-01 13:12     ` Alex Griffin
2019-07-05  8:35       ` Guix UCI comparison (was Re: Guix beyond 1.0: let’s have a roadmap!) Giovanni Biscuolo
2019-07-07 14:09       ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2019-06-27 19:33 ` Guix beyond 1.0: let’s have a roadmap! Svante Signell
2019-06-27 21:25   ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-06-27 20:28 ` Thompson, David
2019-07-01  9:36   ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-07-01 10:39     ` Hartmut Goebel
2019-07-01  9:37   ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-06-27 22:01 ` Pierre Neidhardt
2019-06-27 22:24 ` Julien Lepiller
2019-07-01  9:48   ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-06-28 16:54 ` znavko
2019-06-28 17:07   ` swedebugia
2019-06-28 17:17   ` znavko
2019-06-29  1:35 ` ison
2019-06-29  4:51   ` pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
2019-07-01  9:51     ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-06-30 13:13 ` Giovanni Biscuolo
2019-06-30 13:38   ` Robert Vollmert
2019-07-01  9:55     ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-07-05 11:47       ` Robert Vollmert
2019-07-09 10:22         ` Ricardo Wurmus
2019-07-09 10:58           ` Robert Vollmert
     [not found]     ` <877e97vws8.fsf%40gnu.org504D1A97-2EBD-46A1-85B8-091C923DD6A1@vllmrt.net>
2019-07-26  7:00       ` Ben Sturmfels
2019-07-26  8:27         ` Pierre Neidhardt
2019-08-22 20:59         ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-06-30 13:28 ` Christopher Lemmer Webber
2019-07-01  9:57   ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-07-01 11:47     ` Pierre Neidhardt
2019-06-30 13:59 ` Giovanni Biscuolo
2019-07-01  9:58   ` Ludovic Courtès
2019-07-09 13:32 ` P
2019-07-11 10:11   ` Ricardo Wurmus
2019-07-11 15:17     ` Ludovic Courtès
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-06-28 18:57 Jesse Gibbons
2019-07-01 10:14 ` zimoun
2019-07-01 19:38   ` Jesse Gibbons
2019-07-06 12:50 matias_jose_seco
2019-07-07 14:20 ` Ludovic Courtès

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ef32aqcr.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=ludo@gnu.org \
    --cc=a@ajgrf.com \
    --cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).