From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: Starting 'core-updates'? Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 16:18:50 +0100 Message-ID: <87eeux8aed.fsf@devup.no> References: <87mua8sma4.fsf@devup.no> <87wo8qcy7o.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47097) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j2ck5-0001yn-DL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 10:18:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j2ck3-00089Q-Id for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 10:18:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87wo8qcy7o.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, 38390@debbugs.gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes: > Marius Bakke writes: > > Hello Marius, > >> The 'core-updates' branch is starting to look pretty good, and I am >> happy to report that it "works for me". :-) >> >> Some of the big changes include: > >> I suggest that we set a "freeze" date shortly after FOSDEM to start >> integrating it. Are there other branches that should be included? > >> Maybe wip-bootstrap > > Definately maybe! I think that Timothy, Ludo and I have finally done > what set out to do (see https://bugs.gnu.org/38390). > > I have squashed the remaining squash-commits and freshly rebased > `wip-bootstrap' on core-updates, so I think that from our point of view > we are ready for merge. WYDT? Excellent, really looking forward to seeing this merged! Cutting the bootstrap seed down to ~60 MiB is nothing short of amazing. I think that with this branch merged as well as the glibc&binutils update from we are ready to start the 'core-updates' branch. \o/ We still need to change the default Guile to 3.0. Any takers? :-) --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAl5GuloACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPr1BAgAnnE5OApq+pub194u/s4x6KKEZl/pHVj4AVJfhPMx4Ioak2f43rPI42JX oTW6Zw0m01xZ9LkZHSJ13xZgG2FOT7Cer+XRsUrqsubiKZ3Sv23k5jaV838SS4qR hoBGcdTmzxXL3C8ZT9BWHkC9XoA/Oe6xr/rX4aD4uDk9hKmBYevJervYllAmiiIP ktLRGaKngLEe+RJ6PrmhHW/jpCJF5NteSHHTk/tFkCK8iKLAjZHiUK6gdTNEOL+A 2XzzytQeS0E5M4VZh4CyOfqGnKBt6gKEmodfK4O2ugsABlx3loy0wksni7RG9LKV yx2t+esBizSmoo0+3Lpeg+Sn3nk7Pw== =Cxl/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--