From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id J2JWH3rX4F40OwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 12:52:10 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id IBulGnrX4F5jVQAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 12:52:10 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF0F6940668 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 12:52:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:56324 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jj0DA-0007zE-Ly for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 08:52:08 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58370) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jj0D1-0007yw-8J for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 08:51:59 -0400 Received: from relay12.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.178.232]:53629) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jj0D0-00073g-21; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 08:51:58 -0400 Received: from bababa (lfbn-idf2-1-1315-147.w92-169.abo.wanadoo.fr [92.169.129.147]) (Authenticated sender: mail@ambrevar.xyz) by relay12.mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2B2AE200017; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 12:51:51 +0000 (UTC) From: Pierre Neidhardt To: Mathieu Othacehe Subject: Re: Why does slim-service-type depend on GTK+? In-Reply-To: <87wo4fcdtj.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> References: <871rmnfjek.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87v9jzme7o.fsf@gnu.org> <87wo4fcdtj.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 14:51:45 +0200 Message-ID: <87eeqnccda.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=217.70.178.232; envelope-from=mail@ambrevar.xyz; helo=relay12.mail.gandi.net X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/06/10 08:51:53 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 3.11 and newer X-Spam_score_int: -5 X-Spam_score: -0.6 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (-0.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, FROM_SUSPICIOUS_NTLD=1, PDS_OTHER_BAD_TLD=1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.39 X-TUID: OzvehKh87OQ+ --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I confirm that xf86-input-libinput with libinput-minimal works. =2D-=20 Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/ --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEUPM+LlsMPZAEJKvom9z0l6S7zH8FAl7g12EACgkQm9z0l6S7 zH8VSAf+JSd9YyjoPQxVU9lUnnS5BTyMjXaBLl+4qk5/oNinnaRJMxN6600haet2 G7KpAZibpg6krBq9/h5bOr/nuBtWwYPY106BA4UMm8zfgHI4dGq0/e6faJeapHW3 UXBFVYx33yxuWM76uGIa1ICJrH8NzW6YQ40Q4GxXR+vrWX1axqcqIxGwSg+gpPgd p6ctYVwNsgEBYHSS2Y4fM2RMcbFa4c6cd7EjCAYvSJUybr7Z0V2PIbRI8U/Rbfob 2pSzImb7ESbYAeZWtuBE1XJ38LZg/FvjOHfWKv1O5HzOEADhf4IuqjvRVuFGgnTd te4lY2d4Y6Dt1GXw3BVhT4Jov9ZD5g== =i0mW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--