From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:306:f42::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id AD4jMC6Zy2GgiAAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 00:09:34 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id 0M8eLS6Zy2EiRQAAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 00:09:34 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DD0FB0EA for ; Wed, 29 Dec 2021 00:09:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:56710 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n2Lb3-00064P-IX for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 18:09:33 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53954) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n2Lap-00063z-CG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 18:09:20 -0500 Received: from [2a02:c205:2020:6054::1] (port=37186 helo=tobias.gr) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1n2Lan-000443-7i for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Dec 2021 18:09:18 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=2018; bh=XhIJljQTDhD3K ef0PfOplnzSJ5JdTLIrokakOx/589g=; h=in-reply-to:date:subject:cc:to: from:references; d=tobias.gr; b=BMqp+XyFsUQBp9helEyxJ6pjYWxYoiHkVXvWCY Bs1Ca/t8PG09mNvzgAleNFGuC2L5LG8iq/EZ2VzQ0SQCOEY5fS+lxT5eotYNO4DFwd3X9l kuceVi1MICodXudtYuFH00105vejqCia7VPgLP7W81qWRBu1lWXgLgtYox+IQWnZ/CRfC6 zrxBp1GvN1JEq549EO8obXJwWhBAur1JVSlkIa5ZvwH/yrQ0bnKnuY+knbUytFhDaut6Lv sKDz/L7lShDA4kzDKWUb0tZsTA/678Zam/yUWbTnj1Xrsb/caxP4lH1jMRkstp4ax2iNUz D1erAYAiP7VGwGsvLcv+OORQ== Received: by submission.tobias.gr (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id ee822401 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Tue, 28 Dec 2021 23:09:12 +0000 (UTC) References: <87h7asij6y.fsf@elephly.net> <87zgokfpak.fsf@nckx> <87a6gkiggk.fsf@elephly.net> <871r1wicgr.fsf@elephly.net> From: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: Leo Famulari , guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: git hook error Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2021 23:45:48 +0100 In-reply-to: <871r1wicgr.fsf@elephly.net> BIMI-Selector: v=BIMI1; s=default; Message-ID: <87ee5wfhsm.fsf@nckx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a02:c205:2020:6054::1 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a02:c205:2020:6054::1; envelope-from=me@tobias.gr; helo=tobias.gr X-Spam_score_int: -12 X-Spam_score: -1.3 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.3 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1640732974; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=XhIJljQTDhD3Kef0PfOplnzSJ5JdTLIrokakOx/589g=; b=klLT++5cZJJeufjEmIcquWOZl+iczZRaCEG7YgGVdtbLVieYEhS/9pbvFtA5BpzIGM50fp dcXZMKnowpCh8wGTDejBOOQYQ0TssIhnryKjERDVa17PmGzyrzU4uAbollMNMdQOmdoEt1 E9xjH9+86rPycxnsYJaANkR+xU0r5WA44NEmY5YWhCHs3TGHyR1Tuf5L0p9ZWcE5rNnAMY X2+wjEzeeRC/fcWe68Av1bwJew8HSAN7DzC6i377HiZzkhef9c3PkoA3p521xdI7blUe// dRMlL7Y8ju6Gz3GDwfymLTxeC58w47uTQwDNP5RXMSDFS1FS6gcFyl8xqrFG9w== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1640732974; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=A11x72qxNJy2ChS6eZiHWoh3TocgvHErFmqjFkw29iMao9OIky4bGBWw6P/J8XP0xW1Xm/ A/JnbPKVArnKO7zAKGVu+TwxcDDhQtrFtGWwB/QNBWUyyEbQzhL6qE2ZWulyiP3b/GOdR5 i0Q1g96ViXbUIMZROVowO75kZjJKfLwsC6kZQTkJSfMxS5LYhbCXj6sW8cc6rnszIJL8o2 zr14HQDT8mymuvCXYvcmqNue4vrO8B5PwjwZTwUnp6upCChqUFJtqLLwM2ycgbDfbO/C9G yFgikGSjrpNUKO3/ad+jAC7ydBdp6AaXy9zwgeHxNMX/lM5r2pCW4/nV2dKBMQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=tobias.gr header.s=2018 header.b=BMqp+XyF; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=tobias.gr; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -10.87 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=tobias.gr header.s=2018 header.b=BMqp+XyF; dmarc=pass (policy=reject) header.from=tobias.gr; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 7DD0FB0EA X-Spam-Score: -10.87 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: QAxb+HXKyZBd --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ricardo, Ricardo Wurmus =E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A > - Savannah=E2=80=99s uptime isn=E2=80=99t quite as high as we=E2=80=99d l= ike I wonder if Savannah monitors and publishes numbers, and how they=20 compare to other popular forges. Why should we do better? We haven't even managed to set up a git=20 mirror after all these years. > - we can=E2=80=99t have server-side checks to prevent pushing bad=20 > commits > - we can=E2=80=99t have server-side hooks to better integrate with the=20 > build farm > - we can=E2=80=99t have per-branch rules (e.g. to allow contributors to=20 > push to > some but not all branches) Why not? Which of these can't be got with server-side hooks? How=20 would you get them on Guix infra then? Could the Savannah admins=20 accommodate us further, if needed? If the real reason for even one of them is =E2=80=98well, we can, but=20 nobody wants to write those hooks=E2=80=99, that only bolsters my previous= =20 scepticism. Kind regards, T G-R --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iIMEARYKACsWIQT12iAyS4c9C3o4dnINsP+IT1VteQUCYcuZKQ0cbWVAdG9iaWFz LmdyAAoJEA2w/4hPVW15qboBAJ2i/0gTwiacCPsHC7L/96YkrhgUMrUkmDDIaihD h6/mAQC6dorm0hFPMxCfK3otRLHrMoFYaSNxwEWODflA7jMFBg== =IaTv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--