From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id QI9YCtwCyWU+RwAAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 18:24:44 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:58f0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id QI9YCtwCyWU+RwAAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 18:24:44 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debian.org header.s=1.vagrant.user header.b=UPwYkoMc; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1707672284; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=0+ailHcIQrj72tdtAzHlf74HFkTLO/yx3i0e1S/Jq9k=; b=Ma2tmf6rNjyFomYKl8ONSWNn81gtxMRDaqfvfsPQTyIjQQrMqnWHNCO8uJm8fGcSbafLKW PBtMt5lUqhfD+mf/KxlgKcm8htVT9zK2L3rcx2G1HdVqmWEG4r4Bcck9QTgieQJPWprs7S IhAaK9nEe8J5Mf064Cq1ozQRAdKWw4PclhLorHc/2a8BlkwJOO1ZJkzA9FPptVUiVlxkNT eXbHDjTmMH7osRzuD/Jn4wiKHG0EuIqOzuotsv7tE3gP5i+v2JfIHnSD80uUWiHTKa9P9j Osi3J80UpthlY/T4qbBjA9dsqOLc7LABY3wukFHjkkXhJPS9HINQnk563FYkMw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=debian.org header.s=1.vagrant.user header.b=UPwYkoMc; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1707672284; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=KqB4+sYlz9dglfAHvyu1iNtHA0AJanxJFRJpEmcMgCCiqH0GVvplE+8IadB0Tfn8OdWtdu UiccUNg2qLf3yBIxAGj1LOHqYKzr+tYsj5fzwwWqZfxhsCzpVbfmdepUp2OIbiFreR8o82 xB9dIRT7TcToUuY9XEW2BnOvV286NLl0F23LxGF3jE4bAy4tcQQ6OYMFU21g5totcsS9NB uJfWQJiFpI4MCVfl15Ov5yKcPkHpNrBRGb9fA3vbGBPyvlJgHrNJqJcRAJlaqy0E9zPZao dwlvearLJ4/bYuUaEUr9a0AoO+aHM4KafDDKlgmmaEK/sZX+uhChb06KWlVK2g== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC9AE69A69 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 18:24:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rZDZ0-0001UU-3S; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 12:24:22 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rZDYy-0001UK-WA for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 12:24:21 -0500 Received: from cascadia.aikidev.net ([173.255.214.101]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rZDYx-0004Jr-6m for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 12:24:20 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2600:3c01:e000:21:7:77:0:20]) (Authenticated sender: vagrant@cascadia.debian.net) by cascadia.aikidev.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B4FFD1AAB1; Sun, 11 Feb 2024 09:24:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=debian.org; s=1.vagrant.user; t=1707672248; bh=DFapNo363vK1tUNetfTdbwwZ4KRpWWFNeru3kJ3rVsA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=UPwYkoMc6We5NkSKRm9GzDyG5ZY88ltP+25H3Ji40rfVUO5PWaNg7sOOFw4Bx3hBB nHdYE/4VHCyOs7EY5UgNAHrDjH4iidMYVVGeJzV4EeV/Lwy6CeUdPK2pcl6wSXi/hz Ag3pjDLQwn5ci1XmJCODI5gPg7oXvz/9sCEm1nLL/KUFz3TSJE+VkEPnKBqeeb4oB8 /VLTPXPzmvI4XZH4OV4lZtRR3C1uyku0gfq6NvT8eVPkEV01kVc1sPGWSEtLBfBRDT B9C3oSBLdr9Innb2/56+yP6x0DqTzxC+ks/ZKNB7mGpthSMEGllwow2gnbfOwYolcV wQxpaQ5k5d1/g== From: Vagrant Cascadian To: Josselin Poiret , Suhail Cc: Hartmut Goebel , Suhail , guix-devel@gnu.org Subject: Re: Guix Days: Patch flow discussion In-Reply-To: <87msscfkto.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> References: <87plx8fl2a.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> <87msscfkto.fsf@jpoiret.xyz> Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2024 09:24:03 -0800 Message-ID: <87eddilxsc.fsf@contorta> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Received-SPF: none client-ip=173.255.214.101; envelope-from=vagrant@debian.org; helo=cascadia.aikidev.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.677, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -10.98 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: CC9AE69A69 X-Spam-Score: -10.98 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx11.migadu.com X-TUID: WxKsZuHyu9UZ --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain On 2024-02-07, Josselin Poiret wrote: > The fact that you have to wait for Debbugs's response after the first > mail to get the proper mail to reply to means that we can't automate > sending whole patchsets, and have to resort to hacks like the CLI `mumi` > tool uses. I can't just send a patchset and be done with it, I have to > wait a couple minutes. Well, that is a conflict between guix policies/practices and debbugs. Debbugs handles sending multiple patches in a single email just fine, which can be done on the initial submission. That has downsides with regards to threading, but given all the current limitations, I wonder if the downsides of having to wait for the initial bug number to land are worth the cost of having to implement a user-interface tool (mumi CLI) to workaround it. That said, the tool already exists... but not everyone is aware of it or for whatever reason is not necesarily using it. Are there other downsides to allowing a multiple patches in a single email? Ideally the technology would fit whatever practicies guix would like to implement... but then we have what we have right now. live well, vagrant --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEARYKAB0WIQRlgHNhO/zFx+LkXUXcUY/If5cWqgUCZckCtAAKCRDcUY/If5cW qhfnAP9T050BioGr3KKE0GSKjQri4D/43wVLPIBoYX2qoVNSSQEA9QPUhdObxBob dQk+AS5KDt0q61LjU9Y9l8w5MChCTwE= =rrbh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--