From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Gtk+ 3 Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 00:14:47 +0200 Message-ID: <87d2no8wq0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20131001112428.GA7062@debian> <877gdxtcki.fsf@gnu.org> <20131001193515.GA22534@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33064) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VR8IP-0003j3-1D for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 18:20:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VR8IH-0003Hs-Ou for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 18:19:56 -0400 Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([141.255.128.1]:49838) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VR8IH-0003Ho-IT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Oct 2013 18:19:49 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20131001193515.GA22534@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Tue, 1 Oct 2013 21:35:15 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Andreas Enge skribis: > On Tue, Oct 01, 2013 at 02:12:13PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> Cool! What kind of files are these? For /etc/{services,protocols,rpc}, >> you could use net-base. > > The error messages are as follows: > D-Bus library appears to be incorrectly set up; failed to read > machine uuid: Failed to open "/etc/machine-id": No such file or > directory. See the manual page for dbus-uuidgen to correct this issue. Blech, what=E2=80=99s this file? I don=E2=80=99t feel the need for another= unique identifier for my machine. ;-) Anyway, we probably can=E2=80=99t do much other than skipping these tests. >> Sounds like a plan. What about making the switch in a branch, and >> adding a jobset on Hydra for that branch? That way, if there=E2=80=99s = too much >> breakage, that allows things to be fixed calmly. > > That would have made sense, but so far, we have only seven packages using > gtk+ (two if which, racket and xnee, turn out to also work with gtk+-3), > so I tested them by hand and just pushed the patch. OK, makes sense (somehow I thought we had plenty of GUI packages ;-)). So that means GTK+ 3 actually works, right? That=E2=80=99s cool! Ludo=E2=80=99.