From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
Subject: Re: Rename oggvorbis.scm to xiph-codecs.scm? (was Re: New package
	recipe: libopus-1.1)
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:26:38 -0500
Message-ID: <87d2jilcsx.fsf@netris.org>
References: <52DFE285.2010206@totakura.in> <52DFE3DD.1020005@gmail.com>
	<52DFED9F.1050404@totakura.in> <20140122205933.GA30625@debian>
	<87lhy6lmva.fsf_-_@netris.org> <87txcubq10.fsf@gnu.org>
	<CAJ=RwfaA3SULzt2KLNJ1ABxc7somzx8=oM7mjJGhHZ=Avx-NtA@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45625)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mhw@netris.org>) id 1W6Pxo-0007si-9z
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:29:25 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mhw@netris.org>) id 1W6Pxj-0002r2-0i
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 14:29:20 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAJ=RwfaA3SULzt2KLNJ1ABxc7somzx8=oM7mjJGhHZ=Avx-NtA@mail.gmail.com>
	(David Thompson's message of "Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:58:43 -0500")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: "Thompson, David" <dthompson2@worcester.edu>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

"Thompson, David" <dthompson2@worcester.edu> writes:

> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> wro=
te:
>> Or just xiph.scm?  Because not everything is a codec strictly speaking.
>
> I like this name best.

Sure, xiph.scm sounds good to me.

     Mark