From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: GNUnet build failure on mips64el
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 16:31:17 +0100
Message-ID: <87d2igiit6.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87d2ih6l4f.fsf@netris.org> <20140221112701.GA26961@debian>
	<53074E2E.5080102@totakura.in>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51190)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1WGs4T-0006gT-Tr
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:31:30 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1WGs4P-0004TH-6n
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:31:25 -0500
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a01:474::1]:57976)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1WGs4P-0004T9-0Y
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2014 10:31:21 -0500
In-Reply-To: <53074E2E.5080102@totakura.in> (Sree Harsha Totakura's message of
	"Fri, 21 Feb 2014 14:01:34 +0100")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Sree Harsha Totakura <sreeharsha@totakura.in>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Sree Harsha Totakura <sreeharsha@totakura.in> skribis:

> On 02/21/2014 12:27 PM, Andreas Enge wrote:
>> there are also (apparently unrelated) test failures on x86_64:
>>    http://hydra.gnu.org/build/39813
>
> We were discussing this yesterday on the IRC.  It looks like the tests
> are timing out due to hydra being slow.  I tested this on my machine and
> 2 other X86_64s and they did well.

Indeed, it built fine on my x86_64 machine.

On the GNUnet side, it would be great if the tests were less timing sensiti=
ve.

Ludo=E2=80=99.