From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] gnu: Add imlib2.
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 14:54:17 +0200
Message-ID: <87d2ajlv2e.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87wq8scc81.fsf@gmail.com> <20140925124413.GA7749@debian>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35368)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1XX8Z1-00043g-8g
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 08:54:33 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1XX8Yw-0003vI-8M
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 08:54:27 -0400
Received: from hera.aquilenet.fr ([2a01:474::1]:35804)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>)
	id 1XX8Yw-0003uT-27
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 08:54:22 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20140925124413.GA7749@debian> (Andreas Enge's message of "Thu,
	25 Sep 2014 14:44:13 +0200")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com>

Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> skribis:

> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 12:53:50PM +0400, Alex Kost wrote:
>> All 3 packages have some custom licenses, so I used "bsd-style", but I'm
>> not sure about it.  Along with the patch, I'm attaching "COPYING".  What
>> license it is?
>
> Whenever I read "deal in the software without restriction", I think of x.=
org,
> which I packaged. So this looks like the x11 license:
>    http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:X11
>
> This license adds more sentences, from the second sentence of the second
> paragraph on: "In addition publicly documented acknowledgment must be giv=
en
>  that this software has been used...".
>
> So I suppose you should use x11-style.

Agreed, with a comment explaining this.

Otherwise LGTM!

Ludo=E2=80=99.