From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paul van der Walt Subject: Website, differentiating GuixSD vs Guix Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 21:22:49 +0200 Message-ID: <87d21vrr3q.fsf@denknerd.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47316) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yv9aD-0006ps-5M for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2015 15:23:14 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yv9a9-0004w9-VU for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2015 15:23:13 -0400 Received: from mx01.mykolab.com ([95.128.36.1]:64786 helo=mx-out01.mykolab.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yv9a9-0004vG-P9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 May 2015 15:23:09 -0400 Received: from mx03.mykolab.com (mx03.mykolab.com [10.20.7.101]) by mx-out01.mykolab.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 725586215D for ; Wed, 20 May 2015 21:23:04 +0200 (CEST) List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Guix-devel --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Hello Guix, Minor headache i had, thought i'd share. Went to the website to download the binary tarball (which seems to work very well, kudos!), but was bitten by the fact that the GuixSD and GNU Guix downloads aren't separated. I first ended up with GuixSD instead of Guix, then after reading way too quickly concluded that i686 was what i wanted, ended up with the wrong Guix for my platform (x86_64, which is visually at the end of the "list" containing GuixSD 0.8.2 (x86_64) and GuixSD 0.8.2 (i686)). So, i realise i should read more carefully and all, but perhaps a horizontal rule between the two GuixSD and the 4 GNU Guix downloads would be nice? Feel free to call me hasty and myopic or just ignore me. Otherwise it looks really polished, congrats :) Ciao, p. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVXN8JAAoJEPKEaxoNMsRCW/0P/Rg2Qj4o4mvOzfzjL1yDFNQv t2lhQwzmETBCpZIQJo2243ovspmbU7EjJuvL3SiTXg1nTKuQ30pejv+Qnk0iXbs9 FEhM7cO1hq8ES+4Qb53yX+iT3yM8rNEs1LizNJJXVkbqF/WK1K0nIcXEzr3vLQsu RyIpT0UVwj+tVVssjluWfawCXUTQoYzXhUm5ixS17t92wlAsp/AJEiwrDLKRwyGY HvKqRv3jzpgXDM9E83drDqMHXyI1d+5yePm9mvH2RZkBDed5rCKjFBiTZS4jmNx/ WYs/1XJ7TSAbzcIDGYeO1dMBwLrdgWVdposXc1hslmv9M3oOVOCJG42ustgN9Nfg n6L+VG+Y2fOSlt1RHRu3o1eg3acXITKjhcgzBSQN9eJ4b8t3+RyNExMX1bwKotr/ FMQP4bqKsPNmXLNbbVCt9lGO53k3vN7KC36PdsbORbSAzNOtoJgqgYE/Xexi48b5 HTC52wM6X3SPNQH1eu21rnctIzDV1Qy/AdaBlHtfWcCx31sBzzoRU/ARuJnUR1/l 6j04YUsNc1CGX3xkLlO5LoqPqbviVzqpGe6EPFADKweprQ84IOYhwlQ/E7Oh9k7O 6PyLV8P6R+DeiUhPB4KOZRPFyGo2XtOvvjuPayV6J6k5IRgmizhRnWkWpJHj5//3 MzyULN2KYY8PDRo2EWCW =IKOj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--