From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Feng Shu Subject: Is sha256 optional? Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 19:24:06 +0800 Message-ID: <87d21svort.fsf@163.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40976) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YvlEA-0002OU-Cx for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2015 07:34:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YvlE7-0000pY-56 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2015 07:34:58 -0400 Received: from m50-134.163.com ([123.125.50.134]:47572) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YvlE6-0000ol-B5 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 22 May 2015 07:34:55 -0400 List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: guix Cc: Feng Shu Is the below code optional? #+BEGIN_COMMENT (sha256 (base32 "XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX")) #+END_COMMENT --