From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mathieu Lirzin Subject: Re: Plan for 0.9.0 Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 20:26:33 +0200 Message-ID: <87d1wi1v6u.fsf@openmailbox.org> References: <87io6b943m.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53248) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zm4Hk-0003eq-PF for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:26:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zm4He-0000mJ-P6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:26:51 -0400 Received: from smtp27.openmailbox.org ([62.4.1.61]:37568) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zm4He-0000l6-GV for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 14:26:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Tue, 13 Oct 2015 17:27:36 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel , Daniel Pimentel Ricardo Wurmus writes: > Alex Vong writes: > >> Regarding gc, I remember I accidentally ran "guix gc" and removed all >> the build dependencies like bash, glibc... Then, I realized the proper >> way to run gc is to run "guix gc -d ". Perhaps we should >> change the command for garbage collecting everything from "guix gc" to >> "guix gc -a" and "guix gc --all". Does this sound reasonable? > > I think this is not a bad idea. It would also make =E2=80=9Cguix gc=E2= =80=9D behave > more like the other sub-commands (i.e. require an argument). > > It=E2=80=99s not a command that=E2=80=99s used so often that the addition= al argument > would hurt much, in my opinion. This makes sense to me too. -- Mathieu Lirzin