From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: Lint on line Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 12:42:57 +0200 Message-ID: <87d1unvmmm.fsf@gnu.org> References: <871tbhy6i6.fsf@gnu.org> <20151130182739.GA10869@debian> <87si3l3jx8.fsf@gnu.org> <20151202085239.GD6872@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34461) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4RLu-0003hu-NO for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 05:43:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4RLr-0003aH-GC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 03 Dec 2015 05:43:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20151202085239.GD6872@debian.eduroam.u-bordeaux.fr> (Andreas Enge's message of "Wed, 2 Dec 2015 09:52:39 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel Andreas Enge skribis: > On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 08:36:30AM +0100, Jan Syn=C3=A1=C4=8Dek wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 11:04 PM, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wro= te: >> > Initially I left them so that each package at gnu.org/s/guix/packages >> > could contain a reference to its (possibly empty) issue list (each >> > package has an anchor in issues.html.) >> > Do you think that would make sense? > > One could drop the link if there are no issues. But that would assume > that the package list page is aware of the issue page and is recreated > each time the issue page changes. Right, and that=E2=80=99s not the case. The pages are built separately; the package pages is built in seconds, whereas the issue pages is built in hours. >> Or maybe one extra button and a tiny piece of javascript to show/hide >> the no-issue packages? > > That sounds like a nice solution. Empty issue list could be of a special > css class, which would make implementing this easy. That would be nice. Any takers? See . Thanks, Ludo=E2=80=99.