From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update biopython to 1.66. Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2015 22:23:35 +0100 Message-ID: <87d1ufl3jc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <56432640.8050904@uq.edu.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34527) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6mDK-0006TT-32 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 16:23:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a6mDF-0000s2-AB for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Dec 2015 16:23:54 -0500 In-Reply-To: <56432640.8050904@uq.edu.au> (Ben Woodcroft's message of "Wed, 11 Nov 2015 21:28:00 +1000") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ben Woodcroft Cc: "guix-devel@gnu.org" Hi Ben, It seems that this ~1 month old message fell through the cracks, sorry about that! Ben Woodcroft skribis: > I also figure with the shiny new updaters it might make things easier > if pypi is used instead of the biopython site. I think so. Is it the same archive that is served on both sites? For instance, does the pypi version include tests and doc as well? > From bb6e9ba482ea8602afafd9f6a310a8053544bd80 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Ben Woodcroft > Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 21:27:02 +1000 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: python-biopython, python2-biopython: Update to 1.66. > > * gnu/packages/bioinformatics.scm (python-biopython, python2-biopython): = Update to 1.66. > [source]: Use PyPi instead of biopython.org. That looks good. Ricardo? Thanks! Ludo=E2=80=99.