From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add Augeas. Date: Wed, 03 Feb 2016 10:37:54 +0100 Message-ID: <87d1sexhfx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160122202934.GB27435@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57532) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQtsz-0000Qh-44 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 04:38:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aQtsu-0000h8-Bq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 04:38:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Ricardo Wurmus's message of "Tue, 2 Feb 2016 16:50:07 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: guix-devel Ricardo Wurmus skribis: > Leo Famulari writes: > >>> + (build-system gnu-build-system) >>> + ;; Marked as "required" in augeas.pc >>> + (propagated-inputs >>> + `(("libxml2" ,libxml2))) I find it clearer to put the comment right below =E2=80=98propagated-inputs= =E2=80=99. >> Is there really no way to avoid this? > > I don=E2=80=99t know. The problem is that I don=E2=80=99t think it works to put an absolute file = name in the =E2=80=98Requires=E2=80=99 field of a =E2=80=98.pc=E2=80=99 file, so= I don=E2=80=99t think we can avoid it unfortunately. However, since Augeas is a library, the propagated input is acceptable: in practice, people probably won=E2=80=99t have it in their main environmen= t, but rather in a =E2=80=98guix environment=E2=80=99 thing, or in a dedicated= development profile. Ludo=E2=80=99.