From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix jellyfish on non-x86_64
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 18:26:16 +0100
Message-ID: <87d1rgd9vr.fsf@mdc-berlin.de>
References: <8760xadti8.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> <20160227233117.GA12075@solar>
	<87povgdh8r.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> <20160228145241.GA19415@solar>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39861)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Ricardo.Wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>) id 1aa56z-0005QR-SC
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 12:26:30 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Ricardo.Wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>) id 1aa56v-0002Yi-Ra
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 12:26:29 -0500
Received: from venus.bbbm.mdc-berlin.de ([141.80.25.30]:43475)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Ricardo.Wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>) id 1aa56v-0002Yb-ID
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Feb 2016 12:26:25 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20160228145241.GA19415@solar>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>


Andreas Enge <andreas@enge.fr> writes:

> On Sun, Feb 28, 2016 at 03:47:16PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> Possibly, but the author would like it to run on more than one archite=
cture:
>>   https://github.com/gmarcais/Jellyfish/issues/52#issuecomment-1713199=
52
>> I don=E2=80=99t know if this fixes the build for i686 and mips.  Do yo=
u think we
>> could apply it and check the build logs for errors then?
>
> Could you build the package for i686 (I think "--system=3Di686-linux" i=
s the
> magic option)? And maybe Mark could test it on one of the mips (mine is=
 so
> slow that I unplugged it; it would probably take a few days to get up t=
o
> par with master...). If it fixes no architecture, then there is not muc=
h
> use in applying it (but also no harm; so as it will probably make
> communication with the author easier if you can point to build logs,
> why not apply it finally).

Yeah, it doesn=E2=80=99t fix the build on i686.  I reported this to upstr=
eam.
Obviously, there=E2=80=99s no use in applying this patch.

~~ Ricardo