From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: SourceForge URLs changed Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 18:34:15 +0200 Message-ID: <87d1m7x854.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87zipmmpgd.fsf@gnu.org> <20160716025800.GA17853@jasmine> <20160721143353.GA26408@jasmine> <20160721153211.GA2437@solar> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47854) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQGvZ-0007sJ-Mw for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:34:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bQGvT-0000uw-Mg for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:34:24 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160721153211.GA2437@solar> (Andreas Enge's message of "Thu, 21 Jul 2016 17:32:11 +0200") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Andreas Enge Cc: guix-devel Andreas Enge skribis: > Hello Leo, > > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:33:53AM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: >> The attached patch updates the URLs for the failing Sourceforge >> packages, A-P. > > I do not think this kind of trivial patch (trivial in complexity, not in > the amount of work required!) does not warrant a review, you may simply push. > > Thanks a lot for this big effort! +1 Ludo'.