unofficial mirror of guix-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de>
To: kei@openmailbox.org
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add p7zip.
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2016 21:16:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d1lheore.fsf@mdc-berlin.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d2af6f069d7b8bbf217d39583f98cf2d@openmailbox.org>


kei@openmailbox.org writes:

> On 2016-08-09 04:05, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
>> 
>>>> > I see that you took care of removing non-free parts in a patch and a
>>>> > build phase.  Since “guix build -S p7zip” doesn’t run the build phase
>>>> > users would still end up with a source archive containing the non-free
>>>> > parts.  The best way is thus to remove things in a snippet.
>>>> >
>>>> > In “shogun” from the “machine-learning” module we remove supporting code
>>>> > for non-free features in a snippet by cutting out anything between some
>>>> > ifdef markers, but looking at the patch I see that it wouldn’t be
>>>> > feasible for p7zip.
>>>> 
>>>> Also note that it is not completely desirable for nonfree code to be 
>>>> removed
>>>> with a patch, and is one of the reasons Guix supports snippets in the 
>>>> first
>>>> place.
>>> 
>>> Is there a reason to not use a patch in this case? Or can we proceed
>>> with packaging p7zip, using a patch to remove non-free parts?
>> 
>> We don’t want to have a “reverse image” of the non-free code in a 
>> patch.
>> Arguably that would just be a derivative of the non-free code, so we
>> also couldn’t freely distribute it.
>> 
> If this is the case, then should we alert the Parabola GNU/Linux-libre 
> packagers?
> The patch I submitted is the same one they use when installing p7zip 
> from the
> source code (see 
> https://git.parabola.nu/abslibre.git/tree/libre/p7zip/libre.patch).

I see.  I think we first need to figure out exactly what license applies
to which part of the code.  A big chunk of the patch is to remove
references to RAR stuff in the build system and the documentation; that
could probably be removed with a patch.  What is critical is code that’s
actually under the unRAR license.

A quick look at the patch shows me this:

> -  Licenses for files are:
> -
> -    1) CPP/7zip/Compress/Rar* files:  GNU LGPL + unRAR restriction
> -    2) All other files:  GNU LGPL

(https://git.parabola.nu/abslibre.git/tree/libre/p7zip/libre.patch#n540)

This means that we need to delete all files in (1) — for everything else
it’s just a matter of patching the files.  If I’m not mistaken this
means that deleting the files in a snippet and applying this patch on
top of it would be okay.

What do others think?

~~ Ricardo

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-09 19:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-02  0:52 [PATCH] gnu: Add p7zip Kei Kebreau
2016-08-02  7:06 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2016-08-02 15:54   ` Kei Kebreau
2016-08-04  2:45     ` Kei Kebreau
2016-08-02 18:38   ` Eric Bavier
2016-08-08 19:58     ` Leo Famulari
2016-08-09  8:05       ` Ricardo Wurmus
2016-08-09 16:15         ` kei
2016-08-09 19:16           ` Ricardo Wurmus [this message]
2016-08-09 20:06             ` Kei Kebreau
2016-08-09 20:33               ` Ricardo Wurmus
2016-08-12 19:29                 ` Kei Kebreau
2016-08-22 11:06                   ` Ricardo Wurmus
2016-08-22 23:58                     ` Kei Kebreau
2016-08-27 10:36                       ` Kei Kebreau
2016-08-31 20:45                         ` Ricardo Wurmus
2016-09-01 15:57                           ` Kei Kebreau
2016-09-01 18:29                             ` Ricardo Wurmus
2016-09-01 19:05                               ` Kei Kebreau
2016-09-02  8:26                                 ` Efraim Flashner
2016-09-02 11:51                                   ` Ricardo Wurmus
2016-09-02 12:06                                     ` Efraim Flashner
2016-09-02 12:12                                       ` Ricardo Wurmus
2016-09-02 13:49                                     ` Kei Kebreau
2016-09-04 14:31                                 ` Ricardo Wurmus

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87d1lheore.fsf@mdc-berlin.de \
    --to=ricardo.wurmus@mdc-berlin.de \
    --cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=kei@openmailbox.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).