From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: Re: OpenSSL security updates Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2016 21:53:47 +0200 Message-ID: <87d1jdi790.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20160926170138.GA7875@jasmine> <20161005234628.GB17110@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38430) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsEjr-0002AJ-FN for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2016 15:53:56 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bsEjn-0002N6-Fm for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Oct 2016 15:53:54 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20161005234628.GB17110@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Wed, 5 Oct 2016 19:46:28 -0400") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari skribis: > On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 01:01:38PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: >> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: openssl: Update replacement to 1.0.2j [fixes >> CVE-2016-7052]. >>=20 >> * gnu/packages/tls.scm (openssl): Update replacement to 1.0.2j. >> (openssl-1.0.2i): Replace with... >> (openssl-1.0.2j): ... new variable. > > Ludo, you mentioned you were using this graft as a test case for > improvements to `guix lint`. Let us know if you are done with it so it > can be ungrafted on the core-updates branch. Go ahead, I=E2=80=99m done! What I meant by =E2=80=9Ctest case=E2=80=9D is just commit 8389e6f06efde73ebb849a82e0967eb6afec8c39: now the replacement is called =E2=80=9C1.0.2j=E2=80=9D, not =E2=80=9C1.0.2h=E2=80=9D. Ludo=E2=80=99.