From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Marius Bakke Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gnu: Add notmuch-vim. Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2017 20:20:47 +0100 Message-ID: <87d1foxh80.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> References: <20170114150811.21767-1-ng0@libertad.pw> <20170114150811.21767-3-ng0@libertad.pw> <87r3454m2n.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87y3ydeel6.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87o9z9y1yg.fsf@kirby.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87pojped9s.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46526) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSqMI-0008AY-Gs for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2017 14:20:55 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSqME-0001dA-Hk for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2017 14:20:54 -0500 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:35304) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cSqME-0001d6-DX for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2017 14:20:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87pojped9s.fsf@wasp.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: ng0 Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain ng0 writes: > Marius Bakke writes: > >> ng0 writes: >> >>> Marius Bakke writes: >>> >>>> ng0 writes: >>>> >>>>> * gnu/packages/mail.scm (notmuch-vim): New variable. >>>> >>>> I think vim plugins should go in vim.scm, even if it relates to a >>>> package residing elsewhere. Could you send an updated patch? TIA! >>> >>> I disagree. Then we should split up the notmuch emacs integration >>> and move it into emacs.scm by the same logic. >> >> The emacs files are installed with the 'notmuch' package. If they are >> split out, I would argue that they should go in emacs.scm as well. >> >> I don't see the point in that though, since they are less than 1MB and >> do not carry any extra dependencies. > > With the vim removed from the inputs, I'd say this could be just > another output? > > notmuch:vim > notmuch:emacs This seems fine to me, if it is possible to add propagation of ruby-mail on a specific output. Otherwise we should use a proper package declaration. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEu7At3yzq9qgNHeZDoqBt8qM6VPoFAlh7y5AACgkQoqBt8qM6 VPqsTQgAlJ3FbEANL/DVJT2C2C07Y4Q7hMBM0gg5+E3C17laG9aho2ZeT5IG/wo4 MPGfQ9YW6mrTbiYCpAiY9kM3DJqBlxZM7dDdT+tcgC3/HPk/6yhzY+AHw5kI0pvA yrFs8+uhw4VvGztYklHqAucVnbqQeTvbLrizgZ0bsNRZz7Uyq6S8nIDi269zo6t7 4LPhWzVofMT6aDtgtOOF1nDTw05UvMX04+a2yOIHFGET+8jA+OuXUbynGliziSLZ 87l+PhJMUKfnc8BcGsi357XZoSDLyEz3w7PrjI+O2jCrAtTicrZkq4BQ2ynbIrgT VnObBHQbrDVrKPGSRKJ2Qushq9k/aA== =d3gh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--