From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Huang\, Ying" Subject: Re: Could anyone help me to pack the shellcheck (haskell) Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 08:28:30 +0800 Message-ID: <87d1dolkr5.fsf@163.com> References: <87innkkm2e.fsf@163.com> <20170308220438.74ffa36c@scratchpost.org> <87mvcun0go.fsf@163.com> <20170309193441.494c63b6@scratchpost.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45972) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmUto-0005Ky-Mw for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 19:28:45 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmUtk-0002od-Pa for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 19:28:44 -0500 Received: from m12-13.163.com ([220.181.12.13]:34129) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cmUtk-0002m6-2i for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 19:28:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20170309193441.494c63b6@scratchpost.org> (Danny Milosavljevic's message of "Thu, 9 Mar 2017 19:34:41 +0100") List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Danny Milosavljevic Cc: guix-devel Danny Milosavljevic writes: > Hi, > > On Thu, 09 Mar 2017 19:39:19 +0800 > "Huang\, Ying" wrote: > >> Danny Milosavljevic writes: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > On Wed, 08 Mar 2017 20:08:41 +0800 >> > "Huang\, Ying" wrote: >> > >> >> I know very little about Haskell, but I use shellcheck >> >> (https://github.com/koalaman/shellcheck) to check my shell scripts. I >> >> tried myself, but found it is hard for me. Could anyone help me on >> >> that? >> >> Great! It works! > > Nice. Good to know that it works for you as-is. > >>Thanks a lot! Now I can use shellcheck. Could you >> make it merged by Guix? > > Eventually, but it has to go through the normal review process in any case. Sure. > Could you give some details for the description? I'm not a user of > shellcheck so I have no idea what else to put there. Sure. > Also, could you do a license review (check the shellcheck source files > for header comments which say what license to use) and make sure it's > actually gpl3 or later ? Sure. > Then I'll post an updated patch to guix-patches (to be merged > eventually after review) if you want. Great! Thanks a lot! Best Regards, Huang, Ying