From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?utf-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: Re: Recent change in 'guix package --search-paths' behavior?
Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 14:08:44 +0200
Message-ID: <87d1bgvrqr.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <87tw4trtgb.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47360)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1d8QQF-0005O7-VW
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 08:08:55 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <ludo@gnu.org>) id 1d8QQC-0007Q0-0U
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 May 2017 08:08:51 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87tw4trtgb.fsf@gmail.com> (Chris Marusich's message of "Wed, 10
	May 2017 01:45:24 -0700")
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com> skribis:

> Hi,
>
> The manual says ((guix) Invoking guix package):
>
>      This option can also be used to compute the _combined_ search paths
>      of several profiles.  Consider this example:
>
>           $ guix package -p foo -i guile
>           $ guix package -p bar -i guile-json
>           $ guix package -p foo -p bar --search-paths
>
>      The last command above reports about the =E2=80=98GUILE_LOAD_PATH=E2=
=80=99
>      variable, even though, taken individually, neither =E2=80=98foo=E2=
=80=99 nor =E2=80=98bar=E2=80=99
>      would lead to that recommendation.

[...]

> Is the documentation wrong, or is this a regression?

Try with =E2=80=9Cguile2.2-json=E2=80=9D instead of =E2=80=9Cguile-json=E2=
=80=9D.

Ludo=E2=80=99.