* Re: 01/01: gnu: glib: Update to 2.53.1.
[not found] ` <20170521221929.491B921037@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
@ 2017-05-22 12:51 ` Marius Bakke
2017-05-22 17:24 ` Mark H Weaver
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Marius Bakke @ 2017-05-22 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kei Kebreau, guix-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1206 bytes --]
Kei Kebreau <kei@openmailbox.org> writes:
> kkebreau pushed a commit to branch gnome-updates
> in repository guix.
>
> commit 90e0b6024b375f919878414163a6ad5857cc4b3e
> Author: Kei Kebreau <kei@openmailbox.org>
> Date: Sun May 21 18:15:00 2017 -0400
>
> gnu: glib: Update to 2.53.1.
>
> * gnu/packages/glib.scm (glib): Update to 2.53.1.
Many (most?) of the GNOME-family packages follow an "even/odd"
development cycle, where the stable branches have even minor versions.
While I couldn't find it mentioned explicitly on the glib homepage, a
peek in the git repository suggests that they follow this model:
https://git.gnome.org/browse/glib/refs/
So I think we should instead go for the most recent 2.52.x release. Can
you check whether that is the case for "gobject-introspection" as well?
`guix refresh` suggests the 1.52.x branch:
/pre-inst-env guix refresh -t gnome gobject-introspection
gnu/packages/glib.scm:292:13: gobject-introspection would be upgraded from 1.50.0 to 1.52.1
I think it's okay to push these to the 'staging' branch, since the
evaluation didn't get very far due to the offloading problems. Let's
start over when things calm down.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 487 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: 01/01: gnu: glib: Update to 2.53.1.
2017-05-22 12:51 ` 01/01: gnu: glib: Update to 2.53.1 Marius Bakke
@ 2017-05-22 17:24 ` Mark H Weaver
2017-05-23 1:26 ` Kei Kebreau
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Mark H Weaver @ 2017-05-22 17:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Marius Bakke; +Cc: guix-devel
Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> writes:
> Kei Kebreau <kei@openmailbox.org> writes:
>
>> kkebreau pushed a commit to branch gnome-updates
>> in repository guix.
>>
>> commit 90e0b6024b375f919878414163a6ad5857cc4b3e
>> Author: Kei Kebreau <kei@openmailbox.org>
>> Date: Sun May 21 18:15:00 2017 -0400
>>
>> gnu: glib: Update to 2.53.1.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/glib.scm (glib): Update to 2.53.1.
>
> Many (most?) of the GNOME-family packages follow an "even/odd"
> development cycle, where the stable branches have even minor versions.
> While I couldn't find it mentioned explicitly on the glib homepage, a
> peek in the git repository suggests that they follow this model:
>
> https://git.gnome.org/browse/glib/refs/
>
> So I think we should instead go for the most recent 2.52.x release.
> Can you check whether that is the case for "gobject-introspection" as
> well?
>
> `guix refresh` suggests the 1.52.x branch:
Yes, we should always use stable branches unless there is a compelling
reason to do otherwise.
Mark
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* Re: 01/01: gnu: glib: Update to 2.53.1.
2017-05-22 17:24 ` Mark H Weaver
@ 2017-05-23 1:26 ` Kei Kebreau
2017-05-23 15:01 ` Marius Bakke
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Kei Kebreau @ 2017-05-23 1:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mark H Weaver; +Cc: guix-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1563 bytes --]
Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org> writes:
> Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> writes:
>
>> Kei Kebreau <kei@openmailbox.org> writes:
>>
>>> kkebreau pushed a commit to branch gnome-updates
>>> in repository guix.
>>>
>>> commit 90e0b6024b375f919878414163a6ad5857cc4b3e
>>> Author: Kei Kebreau <kei@openmailbox.org>
>>> Date: Sun May 21 18:15:00 2017 -0400
>>>
>>> gnu: glib: Update to 2.53.1.
>>>
>>> * gnu/packages/glib.scm (glib): Update to 2.53.1.
>>
>> Many (most?) of the GNOME-family packages follow an "even/odd"
>> development cycle, where the stable branches have even minor versions.
>> While I couldn't find it mentioned explicitly on the glib homepage, a
>> peek in the git repository suggests that they follow this model:
>>
>> https://git.gnome.org/browse/glib/refs/
>>
>> So I think we should instead go for the most recent 2.52.x release.
>> Can you check whether that is the case for "gobject-introspection" as
>> well?
>>
It appears to be so.
>> `guix refresh` suggests the 1.52.x branch:
>
> Yes, we should always use stable branches unless there is a compelling
> reason to do otherwise.
>
> Mark
No problem here, especially now that I'm aware of the GNOME version
number scheme.
Should I revert the unstable commits on gnome-updates and replace them
with their equivalents? I didn't intend to use unstable versions of the
GNOME-related software. My intention was to upgrade packages necessary
for gjs to build with minimal failures
(glib -> gobject-introspection -> gjs).
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-05-23 23:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20170521221928.10340.63400@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
[not found] ` <20170521221929.491B921037@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org>
2017-05-22 12:51 ` 01/01: gnu: glib: Update to 2.53.1 Marius Bakke
2017-05-22 17:24 ` Mark H Weaver
2017-05-23 1:26 ` Kei Kebreau
2017-05-23 15:01 ` Marius Bakke
2017-05-23 23:01 ` Kei Kebreau
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).