From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ricardo Wurmus Subject: Re: Switching to Artifex Ghostscript Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 14:02:10 +0200 Message-ID: <87d1avg725.fsf@elephly.net> References: <20170520205523.GA27152@jasmine> <87k25b5h5d.fsf@fastmail.com> <87vaougxzy.fsf@elephly.net> <20170523173911.GE17127@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52587) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dEDwm-0001Nx-7i for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2017 08:02:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dEDwi-00076R-71 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2017 08:02:24 -0400 Received: from sender-of-o51.zoho.com ([135.84.80.216]:21067) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dEDwh-000766-VL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 May 2017 08:02:20 -0400 In-reply-to: <20170523173911.GE17127@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Leo Famulari writes: > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 03:06:41PM +0200, Ricardo Wurmus wrote: >> Marius Bakke writes: >> > Leo Famulari writes: >> >> Both programs are distributed under the AGPL, as far as I can tell. But >> >> Artifex Ghostscript is actively developed, which I think is very >> >> important for C software that is designed to handle untrusted input. >> > >> > Thanks for bringing this up. GNU Ghostscript seemed to go >> > mostly-inactive[0] after Artifex changed to AGPL in 2013[1]. The latest >> > "upstream" release is 9.21[2], we have 9.14.0 (from 2014!). >> > >> > I'm in favor of switching to the active fork. >> >> Me too. In fact, I once tried to package Artifex Ghostscript, but >> failed in the attempt to unbundle libraries. > > I'll try this in the next few days. If you still have your old attempt, > I'd be happy to see it :) Unfortunately, I don’t have it any longer. But some parts of it (like the trio package) have since been merged. -- Ricardo GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC https://elephly.net